HERE'S THE LATEST VOTE COUNT AS OF 5 PM, Saturday,11/8/14
23 votes separate Righeimer and Humphrey.
Note that Righeimer has not once trailed Humphrey.
# # # LIBS AND CHARITY TYPES PRETENDING THEY'RE AVERAGE JOES JOIN THE PR CHORUS TRYING TO GET WHITE PARENTS TO PUT THEIR WHITE KINDS IN BARRIO SCHOOLS ON THE WESTSIDE One of the arguments used by the libs and charity types to try to get White parents to enroll their kids in Westside barrio schools is that White parents (and that's who they mean when they use the euphemism "advantaged students and parents") should check the subgroup scores and they'll find that White students in the barrio schools are scoring as high as White students in better rated schools full of White students. Some of these libs and charity types sneer that it's racism that is causing White parents to not put their kids in the barrio schools. Hey wait a minute. You guys just said to check the subgroup scores (of White students--Whites are a race, remember?--oh, that's right, you said "advantaged students") and that these White students, er, "advantaged students," in the barrio schools are scoring the same on standard tests as White students, ah "advantaged students," in more highly rated schools full of White students, that is, ahem, "advantaged students." Can it be that genes matter? Please, stop the euphemisms and quick stepping, you're just looking silly as you twist yourselves into pretzels. What you're really saying, when we cut away all the PC BS is that race matters and that White parents need to look at the subgroups defined by race/ethnicity. Now, doesn't this mean that you holier than though PC libs are really using a "racist" argument and that you're saying it is the Brown students who are scoring poorly on standard tests and because they are in the majority in the barrio schools they are pulling down the averages? But, by golly, those White, er, advantaged students in those barrio schools are still doing just as well as their racial brothers and sisters in White schools, so you White parents should rush right out and put your kids in classrooms where they may be the only White kids. Why? How does that benefit you or your children? How does that profit you or your kids? It doesn't. So, why do it? You PC libs want White parents to overlook the fact that their kids would be in a minority in such schools and would not have role models that they can relate to on very important levels, and you also want White parents to forget that schools are where we form many friendships, develop our values and our outlook on life, often set the trajectory for our future, and where we meet our future mates. What benefit is received by White parents and their White kids by being in barrio schools full of people who don't look like them and who don't have the same culture, often don't have the same goals in life and who may be in the country illegally? Indeed, White parents and their kids have everything to lose and nothing to gain. With everything to lose and nothing to gain why would any responsible and intelligent White parents put their kids in barrio schools? Why risk the future of White kids because some libs and charity types have screwed up views of the way existence works and want everyone to blend together? And, the lies being told by those trying to get White students into the barrio schools by making false claims that there aren't gangs in the barrio schools are absurd. There are gangs in the barrio schools and most intelligent people know this. In fact, Costa Mesa has seven gangs (according to the CMPD) they are located in the slum areas of the city where there are large numbers of rotting, functionally obsolete apartment units. And, all seven gangs are non-White gangs, and many of the gang members are students in barrio schools. But we wouldn't be surprised if some White kids put in the barrio schools are hanging out with Brown gang members and trying to be like them. How do you like that White parents? Is that what you want for your kids? You become what you are around. Say, did you read about the 15-year-old possible gang member and student in Santa Ana who was shot Friday? HERE If you go to the school where that kid is a student, you'll no doubt hear the same silly things being said about how great the school is and how everyone should simply overlook the low student scores because, well, ah, gosh, the students sure are having fun and why they have sports and games and blah, blah, blah and kumbaya. Responsible White parents who want the best for their kids want their kids in safe schools with other students from the same culture and who have many of the same views and attitudes. A simple fact of existence, that I alluded to above, is that we tend to become similar to what we are around--the dominant influences in our lives--and this is especially the case with children during their formative years. If you want to be rich, you should hang out where the rich hang out. If you want to be a great writer, inventor, politician or anything else, you should be around people like that. If you are a high achieving White parent and you want your children to also be high achieving, and if you want your grandchildren to look like you and carry on your family line, the best thing you can do is put them in schools full of other high achievers who are like you. Multiculturalism and diversity are code words for anti-White. Whites are the most diverse people on the planet and we have all the diversity that we need right among our own White brothers and sisters.. Just look at other races. You won't find many blond or red haired or light brown haired Chinese or Blacks. And, you won't find many blue eyes, hazel eyes, grey eyes, green eyes among Chinese or Blacks. Here's the present results of an unscientific poll appearing in the OC REGISTER that is related to the above column:
|
Humphrey led, briefly, on election night after the 2330 "flop."
ReplyDeleteI was referring to the final count each day, not the hourly ups and downs, and Righeimer has never trailed Humphrey in the daily counts.
ReplyDeleteanonymous is wrong. righeimer led at the 2330 flop, the last of the night.
ReplyDeleteBoth "point of order" and CM press are correct. I had the hour incorrect. It was earlier it 2300 when Humphrey was slightly ahead. Thanks for the sharp eyes. Iron sharpens iron.
ReplyDelete