"I have to keep the state Jewish. Things to contradict the values, culture or tradition will not receive a stamp of approval," he said.
If this guy were a non-Jewish White in a White nation and said that he needs to keep the nation White and that things that contradict the values, culture or traditions of Whites will not receive a stamp of approval, he'd be the subject of an immense hate campaign and he'd probably have to leave politics. However, in Israel, such statements to protect the Jewish character of Israel are normal and are often applauded.
# # #
We live in a new Dark Age where Whites are discriminated against by government and are hunted in the streets by Blacks.
# # #
The usual M.O. of trying to hush this up is being followed by the cops and the MSM as is the case in most Black on White crimes. However, thanks to the Internet, the truth is starting to get out.
There's another photo of this woman at the above link after she had stitches put in.
Fortunately, she survived, but she'll have a long ugly scar on her face for the rest of her life.
# # #
Photo of the White victim.
Diversity doesn't work. It is a scam.
# # #
Nice article by a woman who had tests done by three different companies and got three different results. If you want to have such testing done, wait until the science of it improves.
# # #
WHITES STARTING TO DEMAND JUSTICE--VIA THE INTERNET--AND BREAKING THE CENSORSHIP
AND HIDING OF BLACK ON WHITE HATE CRIMES BY THE MSM AND ESTABLISHMENT
Two of the Black attackers of a White couple |
CHARLOTTESVILLE NEWSPAPER CENSORS COMMENTS FROM WHITES ON THE BLACK ON WHITE CRIME (The CM PRESS linked to the original story yesterday[ HERE])
# # #
THE CITY OF COSTA MESA SENT US THIS PROPAGANDA TODAY TO TRY TO BUILD SUPPORT FOR THE CITY CONVERTING CIVIC CENTER PARK INTO HOMELESS HOUSING
UPDATE: The City sent out a second press release today, after we published this column, and this one says that Civic Center Park is no longer the primary focus of the homeless housing.
The CM PRESS COMMENTS: It should also not go on the Westside and we hope the City isn't looking in that direction. If we must have this housing, it should go in a commercial zone and preferably in a former motel that is already causing problems, but it would be better if we didn't have such housing at all.
The City's propaganda is in gray. The CM PRESS has interleaved our questions and comments in red.
Our main questions are these: WHY EVEN DO THIS? WE DON'T HAVE TO DO THIS. NEWPORT BEACH AND HUNTINGTON BEACH AREN'T DOING THIS. WHY US? WHY COSTA MESA? WHY ARE WE DOING WHAT IS BEING DONE IN DOWN SCALE COMMUNITIES SUCH AS SANTA ANA? DO WE WANT COSTA MESA TO BECOME A NEW SANTA ANA? HOW DOES THIS BENEFIT THE STABLE HOME OWNING CITIZENS OF COSTA MESA?
AND ALSO, THERE IS A RELIGIOUS SUBTEXT TO ALL OF THIS AND MANY OF THOSE WHO ARE TRYING TO FORCE THIS DOWN OUR THROATS ARE ACTING ON THEIR RELIGIOUS VALUES BARELY HIDDEN UNDER A SECULAR CLOAK. WHY MUST ALL CITIZENS OF COSTA MESA SACRIFICE OURSELVES, OUR QUALITY OF LIFE, OUR SAFETY FOR OURSELVES AND OUR CHILDREN, OUR PROPERTY VALUES; FOR RELIGIOUS VALUES THAT NOT ALL COSTA MESANS HOLD?
Two public meetings set to discuss supportive housing proposal
for homeless
Posted Date: 12/30/2013
Over the
last several weeks, there has been a great deal of debate put forth regarding
the City’s decision to consider Civic Center Park as a potential site for
permanent supportive housing. During the discussions, it has been erroneously
implied that the City is building an emergency shelter for the mentally ill
and/or a one-stop mental health center for the entire homeless community that
will only attract additional homeless people from out of the area.
[This is the camel's nose under the tent, and will lead to more services either on this site or off site and this will create a magnet effect.]
The City
would like to take this opportunity to provide as much accurate information as
possible. More information will also be given at two community workshops on the
supportive housing proposal for the homeless in Costa Mesa on Jan. 15 and Jan.
16 from 6 to 8 p.m. in the City Council Chambers (77 Fair Drive).
In
addition, you can read staff report from the Dec. 10, 2013 City Council Study
Session on development model options for the homeless supportive housing
project here. Staff's PowerPoint presentation on the various options
can be found here.
Residents
who would like more information can call the City's Neighborhood Improvement
Task Force hotline at (714) 754-4977.
No
emergency shelter planned
There
are no emergency shelters planned in the City nor are we planning to invite
homeless throughout the region to Costa Mesa to benefit from our benevolence;
rather the City is hoping to move some of its homeless residents into an
affordable rental project which will have an array of services designed to
assist these individuals achieve housing stability.
The City
has been studying how to craft realistic strategies and make recommendations
that address the needs of Costa Mesa residents, businesses and homeless
individuals since early 2011, when it created the Homeless Task Force.
Additionally, to assist the Homeless Task Force in its mission, it commissioned
research done by Vanguard University on homeless demographics.
[Vanguard University is a religious university.]
The
original Vanguard Study, as well as a recent one completed in October 2013,
revealed that: there are anywhere from 109-120 homeless individuals who call
Costa Mesa their home; the median stay in Costa Mesa is approximately five
years; 40 percent of the homeless were prescribed medication for mental health;
and 43 percent suffered from drug or alcohol abuse.
[40% of the homeless here have mental health issues. How serious? Psychotics who will murder a citizen on a whim? Like the young pregnant woman who was murdered? Like the handyman who was murdered recently? Like the guy on the Westside who was murdered in his home (still unsolved)? 43% abuse drugs or alcohol. Swell.]
These
trends have been consistent on a national level. Research presented to the
Homeless Task Force concluded that the only way for communities to reduce and
manage their homeless population is through an integrated, multi-pronged
approach consisting of housing, enforcement and mental health services with
permanent supportive housing as the corner stone of the strategy.
In light
of this, in March 2012, the City Council approved nine Homeless Task Force
goals and action items. Goal 1 was to define who was a Costa Mesa homeless
resident and to proclaim that any housing services would only be accessible to
these residents. Goal 6 was to research long-term permanent supportive housing.
Supportive
housing proposal
Since
that time, City staff has issued a Request for Qualifications and interviewed
several developers who could sensitively carry out such a challenging project
while balancing out the needs of both the homeless residents and the community.
In April 2013, the City chose Mercy House Living Centers and Wakeland
Development as a partner and has been working with them since that time to find
a suitable site for this housing project. Based on direction from the City
Council at their Dec. 10 Study Session, Civic Center Park is the first site
that is being explored, but no final decision on any site has been made yet.
[Mercy House Living Centers has a strong religious nexus.]
The City
has scheduled two community workshops on Jan. 15 and Jan. 16 from 6 to 8 p.m.
in the City Council Chambers to gain meaningful input from its citizenry.
It is
critical to note that permanent supportive housing is completely different from
emergency shelters, whose sole purpose is to offer temporary shelter with no
long term supportive services and thus, no end to the cycle of homelessness.
[Again, this is just an incremental step. The supportive services will come as mental health counseling, etc. once these homes are built and the people trying to force this down our throats determine that many of these residents need mental health counseling.]
Over the
past decade, a significant shift has begun to occur in efforts to address
homelessness, with agencies moving away from shelter strategies toward homeless
prevention and permanent supportive housing. Communities across the country
have instituted this approach and reported a decline in the number of people
living in the streets and in shelters.
As
reported above, many chronically homeless people have multiple, complex and
interacting physical and behavioral conditions. Studies have shown that these
populations are more responsive to interventions when they are in their own
housing, rather than living in temporary shelters.
[So, put them in a park in Mesa Verde, where many of the proponents of charity services live.]
How
supportive housing works
These
supportive housing units are managed through an effective partnership among
representatives of the project owner, the property management agency, the
supportive services providers, public agencies and the tenants. Successful
permanent supportive housing has a home-like residential appearance on both the
exterior and interior and its scale, appearance, design and quality are
consistent with the neighborhood.
[What are the management fees? Who gets them? Who pays for the subsidized and free rent? Who is making money on this, and how much? What will be the money burden on Costa Mesa citizens in the years ahead?]
Appropriate
security features should include a limited number of entrances and exits,
security and cameras, adequate interior and exterior lighting and a secure
front desk. Finally, the residents should be able to access a flexible array of
supportive services designed to assist them to achieve and sustain housing
stability and independence.
[Ah, here it is: "supportive services." What about all those previous words that seemed to say there would be no supportive services?]
Proposals
for new supportive housing developments often face opposition from community
members concerned about property values and public safety. While many support
the concept of providing housing for the homeless, the reality of having a
supportive housing project in or around one’s neighborhood can trigger
concerns.
[No kidding. That's why the folks from Mesa Verde who support charity services don't want them in their neighborhood, but try to stick them in other neighborhoods.]
Recent
research has shown that there is little evidence to support these types of
fears. In fact, property values can be positively impacted by an attractive,
professionally managed project. In a recent study by New York University’s
Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy, researchers studied 7,500
permanent supportive housing units and concluded that “a supportive housing
development does not have a statistically significant impact on the value of
properties within 500 feet of the development.”
[Baloney. That's because most of the ones studied are already in slum areas. They're not in places like Newport Beach, Malibu, or Beverly Hills. If they were, they would negatively affect property values, just as they will in Costa Mesa.]
Further,
the report found that once construction was completed on a supportive housing
project, the value of properties located within 500 feet of the supportive
housing actually increased relative to other properties in the neighborhood.
[Aw geez. Again, that's because they're mostly built near decrepit slums, and when you build new housing next to decrepit slums, the slums are going to go up in value. But, if you build them next to a nice neighborhood, that's not going to happen. In fact, the property values will go down. And, if you think property values will go up, then put some of these in next to some million dollar homes in Mesa Verde. The owners of those million dollar homes should be pleased. Right?]
Presently,
there is a shortage of housing for homeless residents throughout Orange County
and it is not unusual to see people sleeping in parks, bus benches and
abandoned buildings. However, ending homelessness is a regional responsibility
that all communities should share.
[So what? Costa Mesa is not all of Orange County. Let other cities take care of their own problems.]
Costa Mesa plans to address this regional responsibility by
providing services only to local Costa Mesa residents. Only by meeting this
local responsibility can the City improve the quality of life and public open
space for all Costa Mesa residents on the whole. However, the City will depend
on the community to provide input on any proposed project site prior to
embarking on such an ambitious venture.
[Again, why are we trying to handle "regional" issues. We are a particular city. We are not the region. We should not be lumped in with Santa Ana and other downscale cities. Our natural allies are Newport Beach and Huntington Beach. Also, this is baloney about only helping "Costa Mesa residents." Anyone can move here. And once they are here they are, by definition, "Costa Mesa residents.]