Tuesday, June 19, 2018

CM PRESS # 103

HUMAN DIVERSITY

Short video
#                                                                    #                                                            #
WHITE GENETIC INTERESTS

If a White and a Bantu have a child, the White will be more closely related to any random White than to his or her own child.  Why?  The genetic difference is that great between the White and the Bantu.

Genetic interests should trump national, political, religious or social interests. Why?  We are our genes no matter what national, political, religious or social groups we may also identify with.

Genes matter and they are us and we are them. They are real and they provide our most essential identity and the path to sending us into the future via the White children we produce.
#                                                      #                                                                      #

HE DINDO NUFFIN

A Mark Dice video
#                                                       #                                                                        #

Monday, June 18, 2018

CM PRESS # 102

THE GATEWAY PUNDIT
#                                                    #                                                                  #
SOMALI NEGROES BEAT A YOUNG WHITE FATHER TO DEATH IN MAINE

Thanks to Obama who imported Negro criminals from Africa and put them in Maine and New Hampshire.
#                                                              #                                                         #
TRUMP'S TWEETS HERE
#                                                               #                                                         #

Saturday, June 16, 2018

CM PRESS # 101

KANSAS CITY: TWO WHITE SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES KILLED BY NEGRO YESTERDAY
#                                                        #                                                      #

Friday, June 15, 2018

CM PRESS # 100

ON GENETIC INTERESTS OF WHITES

Genetic interests are linked to relatedness.

The passing on of your genes by mating with a member of the opposite sex who is also White ensures that your children will carry much of your genome.  In other words, you "live" on after your body dies in your children if you have mated as nature or God intends.

However, if  a White bears children with a Bantu, the children produced will be so unlike the White genetically, that the White would actually be more closely related to just about any random White than to his or her own children! *

*Frank Salter's ON GENETIC INTERESTS.
#                                                                                 #                                               #
NEGROES ATTACK WHITES IN MAINE

Blender Feds have been importing Negroes from Somalia and putting them in Maine and New Hampshire because those two states are "too White" and the Blenders want to turn them darker and to create conditions where Whites will miscegenate themselves out of existence as Whites.
#                                    #                                                               #

TRUMP DEFENDS HIS SUPPORTERS AGAINST SCUMBAG FBI AGENT WHO SMEARED THEM
#                                                 #                                                        #

THE DAILY STORMER
#                                                   #                                                      #
WHITE PEOPLE ARE NOTICING SOMETHING NEW: THEIR OWN WHITENESS

NY TIMES column.
#                                                     #                                                 #
ISRAELI PM PUSHES JEWISH SUPREMACY
#                                                             #                                              #
JEWISH POLITICIAN PROMOTES JEWS AS THE MASTER RACE

Another take on the story above this one.
#                                                     #                                                      #

Thursday, June 14, 2018

CM PRESS # 99

WHITE ADVOCATE TAKING TWITTER TO COURT OVER CENSORSHIP

The social media giants are banning lots of White advocates these days.  They may face having the courts rule that they need to be regulated as a result.  These social media giants want to claim they are private companies and can do what they want, but today they are really the public square where free speech should be allowed.  Watch for court rulings saying what I just said.
#                                                                         #                                                               #
EINSTEIN'S RACISM REVEALED

Seeing other races as different is now considered racism in our present dark age.
#                                                     #                                                                           #

THE FINAL CALL--"ACCEPT YOUR OWN AND BE YOURSELF"

"A rule we must live by."

With just a few word changes, this column by a Black Muslim could have been written by awakened Whites.  It essentially says that you should be who and what you are born to be and that you should not reject yourself or your kind. Amen.
#                                                                     #                                                                 #

Tuesday, June 12, 2018

CM PRESS # 98


The Jewish professors sound like they're quoting me (but for Jews) as I tell Whites to not miscegenate because it is not in their genetic interest to do so and blends them away. In fact, such miscegenation--racial intermarriage is genocide of Whites.  And, now some learned Jews are saying the same thing, but for Jews. Go figure.
#                                                                             #                                                      #


Sounds like a great place to be stationed. I would have volunteered had this been offered when I was in the Marines.
#                                                                                 #                                                           #

#                                                                     #                                                   #

When I acted with De Niro in NYC years ago, he seemed like an okay guy.  Kind of wimpy, but not unpleasant.  Now, he seems to be out of his mind. Maybe he's senile? I didn't think he was that good as an actor and others in the cast probably agreed. I was the one they called an "uptown" actor, not De Niro, which was a compliment.

#                                                       #                                                  #

#                                                                   #                                                             #
GATEWAY PUNDIT
#                                                  #                                                                    #
RESEARCHERS SEE HOW BACTERIA GRAB DNA FROM OTHERS AND INCORPORATE IT INTO THEIR OWN GENOME

Further...We are surrounded by free floating DNA and even the non-DNA molecules of everything in our environment.  Science is just now catching on to what I've written about for years: that under certain circumstances organisms can evolve by incorporating this alien DNA and non-DNA molecules into their genomes.  The "certain circumstances" is what is a mystery...so far.
#                                                      #                                                                      #
GREAT WHITE FAMILY HAS 14TH CHILD 

The parents have clearly heard the call of God or nature to go forth and make more like yourself.

We need millions more White families like this one.
#                                                  #                                                                  #

Monday, June 11, 2018

CM PRESS # 97

LANA ON MISCEGENATION

Video (11:26 min.)

Stay White, Whitey. Don't commit genome suicide.
#                                                          #                                                                         #
HYPOCRITICAL ISRAEL (THE PRETEND DEMOCRACY IN THE MIDDLE EAST) REJECTS BILL THAT WOULD GIVE ARAB CITIZENS OF ISRAEL THE SAME RIGHTS AS JEWS

You read that right. Arab citizens of Israel do not have the same rights as Jewish citizens of Israel.

How many times have you heard brainwashed fools say that Israel is the only real democracy in the Middle East?  The truth is that it is not that at all. Israel is a Jewish Supremacist racist state.
#                                                      #                                                                 #

Saturday, June 9, 2018

CM PRESS # 96

WHITES STARTING TO AWAKEN IN GREAT BRITAIN--CHASE COPS AWAY AT A FREE TOMMY ROBINSON RALLY

Video.

Not used to seeing Whites rioting, are you?  Well, you may see lots more of these demonstrations by Whites. 
#                                                     #                                                                           #
MASSIVE CROWD TURNS OUT TO HEAR GEERT WILDERS CALL FOR THE RELEASE OF TOMMY ROBINSON JAILED IN ENGLAND BECAUSE HE DARED TO TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT NON-WHITE CRIMINALS WRECKING THE NATION
#                                                             #                                                            #
THE DAILY STORMER
#                                                #                                                 #

Friday, June 8, 2018

CM PRESS # 95

THE GATEWAY PUNDIT
#                                                      #                                                           #

WHITE NATIONALIST ELECTED IN WASHINGTON STATE

More awakened Whites are running for office than ever before.  Some idiots think all Whites can be pushed around forever and can be made to shut up if they are called names.  Big mistake.  Pro-Whites are coming out of the closet AS unapologetic Whites.
#                                                     #                                                                 #

STRESS CAN AFFECT SPERM QUALITY

Yes, yes, yes. I know this and I've written about it. In fact, many things can affect sperm quality. This is one of the ways nature regulates the organisms that are born.  In the above article it is pointed out that two months of stress can cause almost 50% of the sperm produced to be weak.  Why is that the case?  It is nature eliminating some sperm that can't make it in the real world while allowing the best to get through to produce a child who will benefit from the stronger sperm that did get through.

Heat and cold and light and dark and many other things can also affect sperm.  The goal, always, is about evolution and ensuring that children who are born are the best suited for conditions in the world at that time.
#                                                      #                                                  #

SELF-HATING ANTI-WHITE BIGOT PROFESSOR BANNED FROM RESTAURANT

Hmmmm.  Is this puke really White or is he one of the ((("Dear fellow White people," tribe?)))
#                                                            #                                                        #
MORE SIGNS OF LIFE, PAST OR PRESENT ON MARS

Okay, folks, this sort of thing pisses me off.  The place to look for life on Mars is at the poles where we know there is water.

 Instead, we keep seeing stories like the above from areas of the planet that are more like the Sahara Desert here on Earth.

I'm betting the bank that if they will just go to where there is water they're going to find life.  And, my guess is that it won't just be bacteria, but will be multi cellular organisms. My further guess is that it will be types of worms, but we'll have to wait and see.

Can it be that the government is still believing that there will be panic here on Earth if we learn that there is life on Mars so they're trying to leak out information a little at a time as with the above article?
#                                                             #                                                                           #
WHY ARE SEASHELLS TOUGHER THAN CHALK?

Short video.

I'm running the above because it once again points out what I've written many, many times over the years--nature works with very minor differences to make very major effects.  And, it works that way with the races of man, as well.

No, not all human races are the same. Learn the basic idea from the above video.
#                                                           #                                                                     #
TRUMP'S TWEETS HERE

Get the straight scoop on the unfair trade that is hurting the U.S.

Finally, a President with balls!

Trump is an original.  Most of the other politicians are weak-assed cowards and tiny brain folk.
#                                                        #                                                           #

Thursday, June 7, 2018

CM PRESS # 94

Anti-Racism Is Immoral

ANTI-RACISM IS IMMORAL
What if everything you have been conditioned to believe about truth and morality is simply wrong? It is.
“Racism” is a term with many disparate definitions. Indeed, that imprecision is very useful for addicts of the term. It is like having a nine-headed dog guarding the church of diversity at all times. The term is more of a weapon than a word at this point. It doesn’t construct so much as dismantle. It is essentially always and everywhere an underhanded attempt to end all civil debate and declare victory, by people incapable of reasoning above a very rudimentary level.
As far as I can tell the term refers to what are four largely distinct phenomena: 1) the belief that races differ biologically and that those differences matter; 2) the hatred of members of different races; 3) racial prejudice; and 4) racial discrimination.
The first definition, namely the claim about inequality between groups and the import of that inequality, is nothing more than an idea, a truth claim to be precise. Our Cultural Marxist overlords tell us that to believe it is to be a bad person. But that is not true and indeed can’t really be true. Only imbeciles and totalitarians could believe that merely believing this renders one a bad person. What’s more, claiming someone is a bad person for believing this, is what philosophers the world over call a “category error”. You see, this first definition is simply a truth claim about the world. It is not a moral act and thus is not a candidate for moral judgment. For example, if I told you the sky was green, and you told me I was a bad person for believing that, I would reply that you were clearly very confused about something. Now, I may be mistaken about the sky’s color, but I am not a bad person for being mistaken about the sky’s true color. To claim otherwise is to completely misunderstand the subject matter of the discussion; it is to inject matters of morality into matters of reality. We weren’t acting in ways that subjected us to moral judgment. Indeed, we weren’t even discussing moral issues, or what ought to be. We were only discussing how things are or how things aren’t, out there in the world. People who say things like, “racists are evil because they think the races differ in X or Y”, are stupid people. They are people, by and large, who don’t even comprehend what they’re saying, or how utterly idiotic what they’re saying actually is. This is a simple, unmistakable category error. Truth claims about physical/objective reality are not moral (or immoral) acts. They do not possess the basal qualities of moral acts. Moral acts and even moral claims belong to different conceptual categories.
The second definition, hatred, is an extremely rare phenomenon, especially in the modern West. To the extent such hatred even exists anyhow, it is situational and fleeting because hatred is sort of inherently situational and fleeting, and it is also virtually impossible to measure or observe, as hatred is itself nothing more than a feeling. Furthermore, like thoughts/ideas, “hatred” is not something that can be moral or immoral, as it is not an act directed at the outside world, but something entirely personal and internal to an individual. However, since I consider genuine “hatred” of this type to be both extremely rare and outside the knowledge of those who tend to kvetch incessantly about its existence, it is basically a type/definition of racism with minimal import. It is also not so much a valid definition of racism as a smear meant to discredit one’s political opponents. So, while I happen to think that hatred can be both useful and rational in certain instances, again, I don’t wish to harp on this definition for the aforementioned reasons.
Admittedly, racial discrimination taken to its utmost extreme can take a society to rather ugly places (think Nazism). And yet anti-racism, even in a purer, not selectively applied, not fundamentally anti-white form (contrary to how it currently exists and is currently understood), taken to its utmost extreme, is far worse. To take the principles of anti-racism to their logical conclusion is to destroy one’s people and one’s society by design, indeed by necessity. To refuse to distinguish between “us” and “them” in the context of a nation is to abolish the nation itself. To do so in the context or religion is to effectively abolish the religion. If any group wishes to survive, it must take some measures to protect the defining characteristic(s) of the group. Indeed, it must take not only some measures, but adequate measures to do so. To not do so, is to ensure its own demise. What’s more, in the modern world, punctuated by extreme pressures to migrate to wealthier areas, to not do so is to ensure the group’s demise swiftly, via parasitism and invasion. If successful groups do not protect their own interests, they are sure to be swallowed whole by the explosive population growth in populations that wish to share in their success, but which are largely incapable of contributing to it.
[SNIP]
Extreme discriminatory racism at least models nature. It at least promotes open competition between groups and celebrates the kinds of successes that nature itself customarily rewards. Anti-racism, on the other hand, is essentially just communism as applied to genes, race, and borders. It is anti-competitive, inherently dysgenic, not progress but anti-progress, and a way for the most worthless peoples on the Earth to gradually consume everything beautiful, precious and decent left on it. Anti-racism is also basically anti-biology. It pretends that evolution magically ceased 250,000 years ago, just because. It is like creationism for leftards, but in reverse. Instead of the Earth magically coming into existence roughly 10,000 years before the present, evolutionary forces magically stopped operating on man a quarter of a million years before the present (when Sub-Saharan Africans and the rest of us split)! Amazing what zealots will believe in the name of ideology/faith.
[SNIP]
As has been shown, the term “racism” may be applied to one of four phenomena. The first phenomenon is basically a puerile insult for those who reject race egalitarianism. The problem though, is that race egalitarianism is just patently false, no matter how rabidly leftist totalitarians enforce this pleasant Neo-Lysenkoist fiction. To enforce such a belief, by the way, constitutes nothing less than a war against the truth itself. All racial populations are not equal in their abilities. They are not even remotely equal. Indeed, as data continues to accrue regarding the genetic differences between human populations, even well-known Jewish scientists like David Reich, are beginning to reluctantly concede that race egalitarianism is just intellectually untenable. With that said, even if race egalitarianism was true, which it most certainly isn’t, it still wouldn’t be immoral to believe otherwise. Whereas the second type of racism is simply just a feeling, not subject to moral judgment, and not a particularly good subject for any kind of moral analysis.
[SNIP]
The third, prejudice, or more specifically, out-group prejudice, is really just an error/bias in reasoning, or alternatively, a structural/systemic error in reasoning, that is more or less in-built to the human psyche and common to all races and peoples (not just whites). I should say, for what it is worth anyhow, that I do not think prejudice of any variety, properly defined, is something to be celebrated. However, our anti-white overlords don’t properly define it. They typically define prejudice as reaching conclusions about different populations that are not Politically Correct (for example: blacks are disproportionately prone to violence). This is actually an utter bastardization of the concept. “Prejudice” itself is a process-based error. It is not about reaching immoral (not even possible) or improper conclusions (outcome-based), but about employing improper reasoning (process-based) in reaching particular conclusions. Unfortunately, disparate impact jurisprudence shows that even our best legal minds don’t understand this distinction. Thus, properly understood, “prejudice” is not a moral error but an intellectual error. However, since intellectual errors are not themselves commendable or useful, they should be avoided, but not because the conclusions one reaches are somehow morally wrong, but because we should all strive to ascertain the truth via sound processes of reason.
[SNIP]
In other words, people (often powerful people in the press and power structure) who argue that “prejudice is immoral”, are again, simply confused. Such types are conflating the bad acts that sometimes flow from prejudice with prejudice itself, as they also commonly conflate bad acts that sometimes flow from racist thoughts, with the thoughts themselves. However, only acts are properly subject to moral judgment, not thoughts or thought processes. Moreover, particular thoughts, like particular ideologies, do not necessarily entail particular acts, and anyone arguing otherwise is simply misinformed and probably reasoning prejudicially themselves. Furthermore, sometimes biases/prejudices can lead us to conclusions anti-racists favor, like false egalitarian conclusions, further elucidating how prejudice is flatly not an outcome-based phenomenon. Thus, any policing of initial truth claims must be made on the basis of their merely being correlated with particular actions or political ideologies, which, in the first place, is just silly, and in the second place, doesn’t get you around the fact that you are still policing ideas, a horrible idea and an inescapably totalitarian practice.
We must also distinguish between prejudice and in-group favoritism, the latter being nothing more than the recognition that the lives, values and interests of one’s own people are worthier of protection. Insofar as one’s own people may be more productive, intelligent or ethical, such a recognition may be based in objective reality, and insofar as like liberties are granted to competing groups, such a position is hardly necessarily rooted in any sort of prejudice (i.e. a biased/flawed reasoning procedure).
Thus, we are left with the final type of racism, racial discrimination, which is really the only type/definition of racism that is even a candidate for moral judgment. Naturally, I would submit to you that a moral value which entails the destruction of the groups that consistently practice it, which anti-racism does, is not a sound moral value at all, but a form of collective insanity.
[SNIP]
One of the chief forms of racial discrimination, for example, is exclusion. However, a total lack of exclusion/separation is an invitation to miscegenation, to cultural disintegration via borrowing and mixing, to the rewriting and rereading of one’s history, to the complete loss of identity, etc. Without any barriers to entry into a group, the group simply can not protect itself even marginally (or protect its ways, customs, or genes), let alone survive as a distinct group. It will assimilate the surrounding world or be assimilated into it. In this way, open borders combined with comprehensive anti-discrimination laws, is not merely bad policy, it is implicitly/effectively genocidal. Racial discrimination in the form of exclusion then is a practical defensive measure against incursion into the group, which, in sufficient quantities, entails the disintegration of the traits that define it.
In the modern world, a lack of barriers in both the national and international context, means mass-scale movements of people from highly unsuccessful regions to highly successful regions. After all, why would successful peoples migrate to shitholes? Therefore, in the modern world, we are not only talking about the eradication of the group via total transformation, but also a total transformation that invariably involves moral and civilizational decline. Thus, a total commitment to anti-discrimination by its very nature is destructive, but in its current form it is also socially, morally, culturally and genetically regressive. To refuse to discriminate is to refuse to be a people at all. A people that adopts such a moral value as its cardinal moral value, and aggressively applies that moral value against its own coethnics, is actively genociding itself as a people. An absolute prohibition on out-group discrimination is to the group what poison is to the individual.
[SNIP]
Now, if you think turning prosperous, mirthful, and peaceful parts of the globe into miserable hellholes is a righteous, wonderful, and moral thing to do, it is certainly your right to be a retard, but it is our position in the Alt-Right that you are woefully deluded. Some degree of racial discrimination, in some contexts, is not only morally acceptable, but morally mandatory. Out-group discrimination is the nourishment upon which peoples and civilizations survive, and dare I say, thrive. Any group which refuses to engage in it, is simply not long for this world. Such a group is destined to be replaced by groups that do take their own group interests seriously, and enthusiastically discriminate against out-group members, like non-white, anti-white leftists and Mohammedans. Indeed, this is precisely what is happening in the West today. Our Cultural Marxist overlords go further of course, and inform us that whites aren’t even allowed a racial identity! But pray tell, how could a group possibly survive if its members must remain wholly unconscious of their own membership in it?
Thus, of the four variant types/definitions of the term racism, only one is really subject to moral judgment at all, and as we can see, it is not an easy intellectual task to defend the wholesale rejection of it (i.e. to advocate for absolute and unqualified anti-racism), unless you think peoples don’t have the right to remain peoples. We can thus rather comfortably conclude that a complete ban on racial discrimination is simply not morality or coextensive with morality. Morality proper must lie somewhere between racial discrimination in all contexts and racial discrimination in none.
 -30-
FOR ORIGINAL ARTICLE GO HERE
#                              #                                                  #

Wednesday, June 6, 2018

CM PRESS # 93

MAINE IS A VERY WHITE STATE--FOR THIS REASON CRIME IS VERY LOW

However, the Feds have started sending Blacks to live in Maine (also New Hampshire) and the crime rate is growing.  The above story is about one of the few murders in Maine. The victim a beautiful White girl and her killer is a Negro.

Without Negros in Maine or New Hampshire there would almost no violent crime in those states.

Race matters. Genes matter. DNA matters.
#                                                                                 #                                                    #


THE DAILY STORMER
#                                                                       #                                                               #

CM PRESS # 103

HUMAN DIVERSITY Short video #                                                                    #                                       ...