CM PRESS # 43

BREAKING:  ACCORDING TO THE DAILY PILOT AT 11:00 PM 11/16, STEPHENS HAS CONCEDED TO MONAHAN

And now we offer this quiet little tune from the Dropkick Murphys.
#                            #                               #
BREAKING:  MONAHAN PULLS FURTHER AHEAD OF STEPHENS

11/16, 5:08 PM--In the just released latest count, Gary Monahan has 138 more votes than John Stephens.  Yesterday, Monahan was ahead by 132 votes.

As we've written before, Monahan has never once been behind Stephens. Although we don't know how many votes are left to count, we believe there are so few that there is no chance of Stephens catching Monahan.  Still, we'll keep watching and reporting on the latest counts as long as they continue.

Here's the link to the Registrar's website where you can see all the votes.
#                        #                            #
FAMOUS CELEBRITY TV CHEF IN GREAT BRITAIN GETS GRIEF FROM WIMPS FOR CALLING A NON-WHITE GHETTO A GHETTO

Instead of groveling and saying "I'm not a racist," the chef said she was "surprised any of the people who might object could read what I wrote as it is written in English."

Go chef!
#                                    #                                 #



A LITTLE OF OUR WORLD VIEW

We wrote yesterday how there is a plan afoot to poison  millions of  rats on the Galapagos Islands.

We also wrote that this is natural selection via poison.

Let us explain a little more, because we find it ironic that this attempt to kill off rats is taking place on the Galapagos Islands--the very islands that provided Charles Darwin with his major insights that led to his theory of evolution.

One of the key elements of Darwin's theory is natural selection.  Natural selection is the process whereby nature selects out the best organisms for any environmental niche by eliminating those who can't compete and replacing them with others who are better adapted to those environmental niches.

Now, because we live in a dynamic universe where everything moves and everything changes, no organisms, and in this case, those such as certain lizards, birds and tortoises, that seem to be the best adapted to an environmental niche--such as the Galapagos Islands--don't get a free ride forever.

Just because organisms are the first in, doesn't give them any moral high ground or guarantee that this is their area forever.  And, just to be more precise, they are probably not really the first in at all, and simply replaced earlier forms and the earlier forms replaced even earlier ones going back to when the first life appeared on Earth.

Also, even among the so-called native species on the Galapagos Islands--the lizards, birds and tortoises, there has always been a constant competition for the best suited for all of the micro-environments. That's the way it is with all life.

In time, and  in every niche, environmental conditions will change and other organisms will arrive there; such as rats arriving on the Galapagos Islands. A static environment and complete isolation are almost impossible to maintain.

And, these other organisms might have adaptations that give them survival advantages over the earlier inhabitants such that the new arrivals may eliminate the older ones.  That is what is going on today on the Galapagos Islands.  The aggressive, hungry and fast breeding rats are taking over and they're eliminating the other organisms that live there.

So now there is a plan to try to kill off the rats with poison.  What will happen?  Millions of rats will die, but some of them will develop mutations that make them directly immune to the poison or some will be clever enough to avoid the poison or will in some way survive.  Those survivors will breed a new generation of rats that will continue to thrive and they'll continue to take over the Galapagos Islands to the detriment of the older species found there.

Why will this happen? To really understand on a deeper level, you have to know that every organism has a DNA code within it that makes that organism as it is.

Now, think of that DNA code as though it is a computer which has been programmed to expand the particular kind of life it has fashioned to fill all of existence.  To do this, it must overcome all obstacles thrown in its way and it must compete better than other organisms.

Some DNA codes are better at this than others. The DNA code for rats is one of the codes that has proven itself to be better than some others because it is able to adapt quickly to get through, over, around or under most obstacles thrown in its way.

It does this primarily because of  a very high birth rate which allows the DNA code sufficient material and time to bring forth a new ONE, a branching of the older version that may not only not die from the poison, but which may actually relish it, or it may bring forth a new ONE that is simply smarter than others, or a new ONE that has dietary preferences that makes poison bait unattractive to it--there are many possibilities and many of them will be automatically explored via constant mutations.

It is this way with all life, including humans, as nature constantly tinkers with life to bring forth the best form to compete for and occupy every environmental niche.

Whenever there are winners in the struggle for survival, there must also be losers.

Another example that we often use of this evolutionary process is the rise of White people in Europe.

Rickets

We mutated to have white skin to be better adapted to less sunny conditions.

Our white skin allows in more sun than darker skin and this gives us a survival advantage since with more sun in, we can make more Vitamin D.

Without proper levels of Vitamin D, people can develop the soft bone condition rickets.

Rickets shortens the lives of those with the condition. Since they die young, they produce fewer children.  In time, those who produce the most children, who also survive to produce children, take over that environmental niche. That's what happened in Europe. That's another example of natural selection.
#                                     #                                  #
UNIONS KILL TWINKIES--18,000 WORKERS SOON TO BE OUT OF WORK AND ON THE PUBLIC DOLE

Actually, fear not, Twinkies lovers, late night programmers and smokers of Mother Nature's medicinal plants, the Twinkies name (also Ding Dongs et al.)  and  all  products owned by Hostess, are valuable assets.

You needn't stock your pantry with a 30 or 40 year supply of Twinkies--which seem to have a shelf life longer than your average large turtle.

If you read the above article, you'll see that Hostess is going to sell its assets--that includes the Twinkies name and the right to make the product.  The buyer(s) will more than likely set up production in  non-union areas of the country.

It often happens that a company, often an old time company such as Hostess, is more valuable when parted out than as a whole, and with the unions demanding ever more, the suits have apparently decided this is the case.
#                          #                             #
DEMOGRAPHY IS DESTINY

Ann Coulter understands...a little.  But, there's much more. There really is a world wide war against White people going on.

If you haven't noticed, then you need to pay attention and be able to connect logical
dots.

Three cheers for skinny women
with low levels of eumelanin and
big guns.

As we indicated yesterday, Mitt  Romney lost the election because all non-White groups saw White Romney as their common foe and Black Obama as their common friend.  And, the non-Whites were joined by self-loathing lefty Whites who are blind to reality and who voted against their own best interests.

Romney presented the traditional American ideas of self-reliance, trying to do your best, succeeding in all things on merit, not taking welfare or government aid and similar things.  And, as usual, Romney (as well as many other Whites including conservatives) tried to portray these ideas as aracial universal ideas of humanity that would appeal to everyone.

Well, these ideas don't appeal to everyone.  Many distinct peoples see these as White ideas, or Old White Male ideas, or if you want to mince your words, you'll call them Western ideas.

Take that idea of succeeding on merit.  That is considered an Old White Male idea, and Obama summed it up when he said "You didn't build that."

Just today [HERE], we read that a court has struck down Michigan's ban on affirmative action.

 In other words, the court said that merit isn't the criteria for getting into college--your skin color is what is important, and especially if your skin color is anything but White.

Look at the photo of the Black woman protesting against the ban on affirmative action.

Her Orwellian sign reads "Stop the racist attack on affirmative action."  You get that, right? In her dystopian view, it's racist to have people accepted to college on a color blind basis, but it's not racist to accept them according to their skin color.

This is not my America.  Is it yours?
#                          #                                         #