 |
| John Stephens (File photo) |
Just another one of the Foley, Leece, Genis liberal clique trying to get Mayor Mensinger and Mayor Pro Tem Righeimer to drop their civil suit against the cop union.
This is something that M & R should not do.
Stephens claims that M & R have said they don't want monetary compensation for the wrongs they've endured. If they said that, it's silly. The way one receives justice in civil suits is by collecting damages (that means money).
Stephens makes a big deal in his column about the fact that no cops have been charged with criminal offenses. He even repeats this several times. He should have ended each of these repetitions with this word "yet."
He also tries to downplay some of the unethical and unprofessional things some cops have done by saying that they also aren't criminal acts. Well, again, people in government and out of government are fired every day for doing things that may not be criminal but which violate the ethical codes of the organizations they work for.
You can pretty much disregard failed candidate Stephens and his goofy liberal opinions.
It's pretty funny to see all the libs trying to get M & R to drop their civil suit, when they have every legal right to try to be made whole. All the suit does is follow the money in a rational and reasonable manner. The cop union wasn't roped into this suit on a lark. The union paid the law firm that paid the private detectives. That's the money trail. It is along that trail where facts need to be discovered.
What Stephens should be arguing is for robust discovery to take place. Let all the facts come out. Let the chips fall where they may. Let the system work as it is designed to work; and, to repeat, that means that discovery must take place.
# # #
THE LAW ON PERJURY IN CALIFORNIA
Our guess is that you may be hearing more about this soon.
PENAL CODE
SECTION 118-131
118. (a) Every person who, having taken an oath that he or she will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly before any competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any of the cases in which the oath may by law of the State of California be administered, willfully and contrary to the oath, states as true any material matter which he or she knows to be false, and every person who testifies, declares, deposes, or certifies under penalty of perjury in any of the cases in which the testimony, declarations, depositions, or certification is permitted by law of the State of California under penalty of perjury and willfully states as true any material matter which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of perjury. This subdivision is applicable whether the statement, or the testimony, declaration, deposition, or certification is made or subscribed within or without the State of California. (b) No person shall be convicted of perjury where proof of falsity rests solely upon contradiction by testimony of a single person other than the defendant. Proof of falsity may be established by direct or indirect evidence. 118.1. Every peace officer who files any report with the agency which employs him or her regarding the commission of any crime or any investigation of any crime, if he or she knowingly and intentionally makes any statement regarding any material matter in the report which the officer knows to be false, whether or not the statement is certified or otherwise expressly reported as true, is guilty of filing a false report punishable by imprisonment in the county jail for up to one year, or in the state prison for one, two, or three years. This section shall not apply to the contents of any statement which the peace officer attributes in the report to any other person. 118a. Any person who, in any affidavit taken before any person authorized to administer oaths, swears, affirms, declares, deposes, or certifies that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify before any competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case then pending or thereafter to be instituted, in any particular manner, or to any particular fact, and in such affidavit willfully and contrary to such oath states as true any material matter which he knows to be false, is guilty of perjury. In any prosecution under this section, the subsequent testimony of such person, in any action involving the matters in such affidavit contained, which is contrary to any of the matters in such affidavit contained, shall be prima facie evidence that the matters in such affidavit were false. 119. The term "oath," as used in the last two sections, includes an affirmation and every other mode authorized by law of attesting the truth of that which is stated. 120. So much of an oath of office as relates to the future performance of official duties is not such an oath as is intended by the two preceding sections. 121. It is no defense to a prosecution for perjury that the oath was administered or taken in an irregular manner, or that the person accused of perjury did not go before, or was not in the presence of, the officer purporting to administer the oath, if such accused caused or procured such officer to certify that the oath had been taken or administered. 122. It is no defense to a prosecution for perjury that the accused was not competent to give the testimony, deposition, or certificate of which falsehood is alleged. It is sufficient that he did give such testimony or make such deposition or certificate. 123. It is no defense to a prosecution for perjury that the accused did not know the materiality of the false statement made by him; or that it did not, in fact, affect the proceeding in or for which it was made. It is sufficient that it was material, and might have been used to affect such proceeding. 124. The making of a deposition, affidavit or certificate is deemed to be complete, within the provisions of this chapter, from the time when it is delivered by the accused to any other person, with the intent that it be uttered or published as true. 125. An unqualified statement of that which one does not know to be true is equivalent to a statement of that which one knows to be false. 126. Perjury is punishable by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for two, three or four years. 127. Every person who willfully procures another person to commit perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and is punishable in the same manner as he would be if personally guilty of the perjury so procured. 128. Every person who, by willful perjury or subornation of perjury procures the conviction and execution of any innocent person, is punishable by death or life imprisonment without possibility of parole. The penalty shall be determined pursuant to Sections 190.3 and 190.4. 129. Every person who, being required by law to make any return, statement, or report, under oath, willfully makes and delivers any such return, statement, or report, purporting to be under oath, knowing the same to be false in any particular, is guilty of perjury, whether such oath was in fact taken or not. 131. Every person in any matter under investigation for a violation of the Corporate Securities Law of 1968 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 25000) of Division 1 of Title 4 of the Corporations Code), the California Commodity Law of 1990 (Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 29500) of Division 4.5 of Title 4 of the Corporations Code), Section 16755 of the Business and Professions Code, or in connection with an investigation conducted by the head of a department of the State of California relating to the business activities and subjects under the jurisdiction of the department, who knowingly and willfully falsifies, misrepresents, or conceals a material fact or makes any materially false, fictitious, misleading, or fraudulent statement or representation, and any person who knowingly and willfully procures or causes another to violate this section, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000), or by both that imprisonment and fine for each violation of this section. This section does not apply to conduct charged as a violation of Section 118 of this code.
# # #
As we indicated yesterday, the CM PRESS has now requested the opportunity to view CMPD manuals on standards, practices and ethics and related matters. So far, we haven't heard back from the City.
We'll keep you informed about this most important matter which relates to recent news events.
# # #
THE NATION...
IMPORTANT NEW RESEARCH POINTS TO THE POSSIBILITY THAT GENETIC MEMORIES MAY BE ABLE TO BE PASSED FROM GENERATION TO GENERATION
It has long been believed that the germ cells (sperm and eggs) are generally not affected by what happens in a person's life. The usual example used is to say that if you have a limb cut off, your children will still be born with all their limbs. The extrapolation of this belief leads one to believe that almost nothing that the parents experience changes the germ cells.
This new research seems to indicate that is not true, and that actual memories (and perhaps more) apparently can be transferred to a new offspring and that the memories may be able to pass down over many generations.
Of course, this might explain the belief in reincarnation, which might just be genetic memories received in the DNA when one is born.
In addition, there are anecdotal stories of children being born with marks on their skin in the same spot where an ancestor had a wound of some sort, perhaps from a gun shot or knife.
\More research needs to be done in this area, and it now looks as though this will happen.
# # #
FBI: HALF OF ALL PEOPLE ARRESTED FOR MURDER IN 2011 WERE BLACK
Yet they are a small percentage of the entire population.
# # #
Hey dumbass, you were attacked because you're White and your attackers are Black and they hate you because of the color of you skin.
Photos of the dumbass lawyer.
You'll note that the attackers are only described as men to hide the race hate angle.
Are you catching on yet, Whitey, or are you as dumb as this lawyer?
# # #
The media isn't giving a description of the two attackers. Wonder why? It's because they're Black.
Say, how's all that diversity you libs have been pushing working out for your family, Emanuel? Hmmmm?
# # #
PRAVDA CALLS FOR A BLACK HOMELAND IN THE UNITED STATES
A good idea, because this also means a White Homeland.
Diversity and multiculturalism don't work. Some group is always harmed in some way. Separation is the answer.
# # #
MORMONS RETURN TO MISSOURI
Once chased out of the state by anti-Mormon bigots.
Bigots never change. They just change their targets.
Religious freedom in America? We've never really had that in practice. It's just a myth that is repeated by low I.Q. types.
# # #
BREAKING NEWS
UPDATE: (7:54 P.M. 7:54 A.M. 12/21/14--One cop was Asian with light skin and the other Hispanic, also with light skin. The Black killer apparently just quickly executed the first two light skinned cops he cmae upon. Had one or both of the cops been Black,it is doubtful the Black killer would have killed them. It wasn't cops, per se who he was after, but non-Black cops.
UPDATE (6:53 P.M. 12/20/14--More on the Black killer of the two White cops, along with a photo of the Black killer. Also, a tweet from a Black Rap Artist mocking the NYPD after the killing.
You'll notice that racial descriptions of the Black cold blooded killer and the two White cops have been left out of the above MSM report. It's just another lie by omission and an attempt to keep Whites from knowing that there's a race war raging in this country against Whites. The result of this hiding of the racial facts of such crimes just puts more naive Whites in danger and makes them easy victims.
# # #
No comments:
Post a Comment