As usual, the PC authorities are trying to pawn this off as a simple robbery gone bad, instead of focusing on the race hate nature of this murder.
Remember, there can always be more than one motive for a crime. Would these two Black pukes have killed a Black if it was just a robbery gone bad, or would they have just left? Our guess is that they saw an opportunity to kill a White and took it.
# # #
YES ON CHARTER VS. NO ON CHARTER--DIFFERENT PERSONALITIES
Run toward freedom vs. Run away from freedom
People are not all the same.
BOLD SOULS: Some people are bold souls. They are self-reliant and are innovators. They take reasonable risks to achieve what they want in life. They like as much freedom as possible and don't want others telling them what to do.
TIMID SOULS: Some other people are timid souls. They are generally not self-reliant and they are usually not innovators. They are afraid of change and they don't take reasonable risks to achieve goals, even if they have goals--and many of them don't. They prefer others making decisions for them. You know people like this. For them it is never the right time to have children or to start a business or move or do this or that. They might as well be mushrooms standing still until they die.
The timid souls can give you a hundred reasons to not do something. They look so much before they leap that they grow old and never leap. And, as a result, they seldom do anything. Many of them are so timid, they haven't even had children or started businesses. Many of them always take the safest paths they can find in life. They are the grey masses.
The bold souls like the charter because it gives a little more freedom to us here in Costa Mesa.
The timid souls don't like the charter also because it gives a little more freedom to us here in Costa Mesa.
The bold souls run toward freedom. These are the people who believe in individual freedom and individual responsibility.
The timid souls run away from freedom. These are the people who want a mommy instead of a government. These are the people who are ruled by emotion and not by reason.
THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION
History has largely hidden the reality that back during the Boston Tea Party days, many, if not most, people were timid souls. It was the bold souls who wanted freedom from England.
Today, just about everyone believes that he or she would have been on the side of the bold souls back then but that's simply not true.
The arguments we hear in Costa Mesa against the charter are coming from the timid souls of our day. They are afraid of freedom. And, their arguments are very similar to the arguments of their timid forbears back in the American Revolution.
If you love freedom, vote for the charter. If you are afraid of freedom, vote against it. That's the choice. All the other words on either side of the issue are little more than eye-wash.
# # #
VIRGINIA NEWSPAPER ATTACKS COPS BECAUSE THEY RELEASED A PHOTO OF THE OUTSTANDING BLACK SUSPECT IN THE ABDUCTION OF A YOUNG WHITE GIRL (WHO STILL HASN'T BEEN FOUND)
Showing photos of Black violent criminals and their White victims makes Blacks feel bad, so Blacks want law enforcement and the media to hide such information even more than they do now.
Yes, this is nuts, and Whites should demand that all relevant descriptive information (especially race/ethnicity) on violent criminals and their victims should be released as a matter of public safety. Just report the facts and let the chips fall where they may.
# # #
CITY COUNCIL CANDIDATE CHRIS BUNYAN CHALLENGES THE DINOSAUR RETREADS FOLEY AND HUMPHREY IN A COLUMN IN THE DAILY PILOT
But the Daily Pilot headline misleads with this: "Current council represents city's past".
Contrary to what the Daily Pilot headline implies, the current Righeimer Council represents the city's future.
It is the two dinosaur retread council candidates from years past: Katrina Foley and Jay Humphrey who want to take the city back to the past.
And, Bunyan seems to have grabbed the word "retread" from the ever young CM PRESS when he writes: "Simply retreading former council members does nothing for moving the city into a new, improved direction."
Bunyan does indicate that he is younger (in a calender sense) than the people on the present council, but in truth he's not a 20's something. He's in his 40's, I believe (at least by the calendar).
Towards the end of his column, Bunyan makes an attempt to swerve away from any possible charges of ageism when he writes: "Age is a state of mind. Young residents of Costa Mesa, no matter what their biological age, deserve to have a voice in our city's government."
If you closely read Bunyan's column you'll see that he pretty much has the same major philosophy as the Improvers and the Righeimer Council which is to improve Costa Mesa by looking forward, not backward.
Bunyan calls himself a sports agent. That may be the case, but the last time he ran he was a hairdresser, so we're not sure if he is doing both these days. No matter. It's just a minor point.
FOREVER YOUNG
# # #
No comments:
Post a Comment