Link
Yup, that's the guy who played a pimp in the ACORN stings. This time he has HUD personnel on the record.
HUD? Right. It's HUD that gives the Costa Mesa City Council money that the Council then gives to some non-profits that only seem to serve one race/ethnicity and which may serve illegal aliens to the detriment of citizens.
Here's the thing about these HUD funds that come to the Costa Mesa City Council. The Council is the gatekeeper and the watcher of the hen house. Why isn't the Council doing its job instead of giving our money to non-profits that don't look like Costa Mesa?
The HUD money that comes in each year as a CDBG grant has to be used in lower income parts of our city.
The Council also has the option of giving 15% of that money to non-profits. But, it's just an option. The Council does not have to give this 15% to non-profits. The Council could stop the misuse of our money and use that 15% for putting in green areas, etc. in our impacted neighborhoods instead of letting the non-profits have that money to feather their nests.
# # #
THE CONSTITUTION PARTY WANTS YOUR MONEY FOR...AH
Link
This party has been around for about 18 years, but as far as we know they haven't accomplished much. Nevertheless, we've put a link above for your convenience in seeing if you wish to support them.
# # #
OVER IN GR
EAT BRITAIN WHERE THE PEOPLE AREN'T FREEIf you think the U.S. has problems with immigration, crime and a devolution to Third World status you should see the situation in Great Britain.
In Great Britain, the British National Party (BNP), a foe of immigration, has been forced to change its constitution and to admit people to the party who are opposed to the party.
The government can get away with this in Great Britain because Great Britain doesn't have a written constitution as do most other countries, and it most certainly doesn't have a Bill of Rights as we have in the U.S. The Brits thus have no First Amendment, and they have no right to free association.
The latest chapter in the tyranny against the BNP happened today in court in Great Britain. A lone judge told the party that unless it made further changes to its constitution (yup, the nation doesn't have a written constitution but the BNP does), that it couldn't admit new members.
Imagine a judge in the U.S. telling political parties what they can believe and who they can admit or not admit?
Anyway, the lefty bigots in Great Britain immediately started celebrating that the BNP had lost. The reason for their glee was obvious. Great Britain is in an election season and the BNP is expected to win many local seats in cities all across the country and maybe its first seat in Parliment. If the party were now hobbled by this court decision at this critical time, it might not win anything at all--which is what the lefty bigots want.
Well, not so fast. The bigots were out flanked by the BNP (again). You see, at an earlier party meeting, the membership had given the leader of the party, Nick Griffin, the right to make necessary changes to the party constitution without having to convene another meeting. And, after the court ruling today, Griffin did just that and immediately opened up the party to new members.
Here's a link to Griffin's statement. You may have to read it twice to get it. The flanking move is contained in the authority he has under Section 4.
# # #
MANY CHRISTIANS JOINING UP WITH TEA PARTIERS
Link
Many Christians are seeing big Obama government as a threat to religious freedom.
DEEPER STORY: Lefties are pushing so-called hate legislation all around the country that will criminalize free thinking and its progeny free speech.
However, many Christians believe that they must speak out against homosexuality and other things and they fear that if they just give their religiously based opinion on these things that they will be criminally charged.
Their fears are real. Check out this article about how Massachusetts legislators tried to sneak just such a law through but were kept from doing so by citizen outrage. Link
# # #
COSTA MESA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FOR TUESDAY
Link
The most important item on the agenda, in our view, is Item 9 of the consent calendar: 2009 Annual Review of Costa Mesa's General Plan. We think that the Council should go through this plan and: 1)add items to thin out our slum buildings, 2) add goals to balance our residential ownership vs. rental figures, 3) add goals to balance our homes vs. industrial figures. All three of these areas are unbalanced and they're harming Costa Mesa.
Of course, since this item is on the consent calendar, the Council won't even look at this plan unless someone on the Council or in the audience removes the item for discussion, and even if that happens the plan is so long that it is unlikely anything will be changed during the meeting.
So, if the Council is of a mind to perk up this report to better improve Costa Mesa, the item will have to be continued to another meeting. Don't hold your breath on this, though.
# # #












