Monday, May 14, 2012

CM PRESS # 858

WHAT'S HAPPENING NOW CONSERVATIVES SPITZER AND BAUGH TRY TO SMEAR DEB PAULY  


Can it be that they're in a snit because she doesn't dislike herself because she was born white? "Oh horrors!"


Well, we're not sure that's why Spitzer and Baugh are attacking Pauly--after all, these guys are trying to defeat her in the election.  


Since they brought up race, let's see if we can coax out some of what the  always PC Spitzer and Baugh think by excerpting a few of their comments from the above OC REGISTER article...

{snip}

Scott Baugh, chairman of the O.C. Republican party and a supporter of Spitzer, said of Pauly, “It’s not surprising to me that somebody who defended a racist email depicting the president as a monkey would also associate with a known segregationist.”
Baugh was referring to Pauly’s defense of Marilyn Davenport, a member of the O.C. GOP’s central committee who last year  sent an email with a photoshopped image depicting President Obama as a chimpanzee.
Pauly, a Villa Park Councilwoman who is also on the GOP’s central committee, said she defended “a woman who forwarded a political cartoon. We’ve had presidents portrayed as monkeys and all sorts of other things throughout our entire history. It’s called political satire.”
With regard to Walters, Pauly said she was unaware that he had supported segregation. “I know him to be a businessman. I know him to be concerned about the fiscal policies and votes that Mr. Spitzer has taken in the past. That’s all I know. All this other stuff you’re telling me is news to me,” she said.
“It’s not surprising to me that Scott Baugh would do whatever he can to get Spitzer on the Board of Supervisors, because he knows that Spitzer will march to his drum and be an obedient little boy,” Pauly said.
Spitzer, who provided Total Buzz with a copy of Walters’ book borrowed from UC Irvine’s library, described the book as “horrific, vile, disgusting sentiments of (Walters’) vision of America, and I believe that he thinks Deb Pauly shares his vision for Orange County, which is a bigoted, segregationist view.”
{snip}

Hey, Spitzer, exactly what are those "horrific, vile, disgusting sentiments of  (Walters') vision of America"?   Oh, okaySpitzer then goes on and says: "and I believe that he thinks Deb Pauly shares his vision for Orange County, which is a bigoted, segregationist view.”


Spitzer should tell us more  about "bigoted" and "segregationist view,"  so we can come to our own conclusion, but he doesn't. 
You see, that's how some of these guys work.  They give you a bunch of hate terms, with no definitions, but never tell you the meat of the subject.  You're just supposed to accept the hate terms as appropriate.

So, we'll have to supply a couple of definitions to make sense of what Spitzer is saying.

"Bigoted" means: Obstinately convinced of the superiority or correctness of one's own opinions and prejudiced against those who hold different opinions.

"Segregation" (from Wikipedia): "Segregation itself is defined by the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance as 'the act by which a (natural or legal) person separates other persons on the basis of one of the enumerated grounds without an objective and reasonable justification, in conformity with the proposed definition of discrimination. As a result, the voluntary act of separating oneself from other persons on the basis of one of the enumerated grounds does not constitute segregation'". (Emphasis added by CM PRESS).

So, is Spitzer saying that Walters wants to separate others (which would be segregation), or is Walters saying that individuals may separate themselves from others (which would not be segregation)?  There's a difference. We don't know the answer, since there isn't enough information given by Spitzer to know this.  However, we are told by the REGISTER that Walters' book defended segregation.  So, maybe what he wrote did fit the definition of segregation. Whatever.

At any rate, and no matter what Walters wrote 47 years ago, he has now indicated that he's moved on from what he wrote in his book (whatever that was).  Or in the words of Obama, Walters has indicated that he's evolved.

Furthermore, would one be mistaken in thinking that what Spitzer said sounds bigoted as he claims that what Walters wrote long ago (whatever that was) sounds bigoted?

Well, anyway, while you're at it, Spitzer,  tell us your vision for America.  Are you happy with the crime ridden cities?  Are you pleased about the attacks on White people by Black people?  Are you pleased with the open borders and the invasion of millions of illegal aliens?  Do you think America is on the right track?  And, since you and Baugh are both trying to be so PC about race, give us your views on the subject.


And, say, will you and Baugh work to get a White Caucus up in Sacramento?  If not, why not?  You are both aware of a Black Caucus and a Latino Caucus.  How come you're okay with them?  Don't they sound racist to you?

We see you, Spitzer and Baugh.


NB: Walters published his book in 1965.  Todd Spitzer was then 5-years-old and Scott Baugh was 3-years-old. Have they evolved since then? Maybe they have different views now than they had 47 years ago?  Should Pauly and Walters see if they can find some poopy diapers of Spitzer and Baugh from that period and bring them to the attention of the REGISTER to prove that these guys are full of it?
#                          #                                 #
NEWPORT'S CITY MANAGER MAKES SAME BASIC POINTS THAT THE CM PRESS EARLIER MADE ABOUT JACK WU'S LATEST STUPID COLUMN ABOUT CITY STAFFING LEVELS

The point:  Wu didn't compare apples and apples.  Not even close. It was as though he was comparing apples and fire trucks.  Hey, they're both red, so they must be the same.

Honestly, folks, this guy Wu is giving conservatives a bad name with his shallow thinking columns that are as illogical as the crap we usually see from lefties.

In fact, wasn't Wu a Democrat before he became a Republican?  Didn't we read that someplace?  And, why did he become a Republican and why is he volunteering as Congressman Rohrabachers accountant, or whatever it is he does?

Well, could it be that Wu is trying to rise in politics and is kissing up to Rohrabacher and other conservatives to try to succeed?  After all, this is Orange County and the GOP generally holds sway here, and especially in the more coastal regions.

Hey Wu, if you think we have it wrong, let us know.  But think before you write, or we'll make mincemeat out of your reply.
#                         #                       #
NORFOLK:  MORE ARRESTS OF BLACKS OVER ATTACK ON TWO WHITE REPORTERS

Media still trying to pretend this wasn't racially motivated, yet the above linked article even states that there were other cars around.  We can guess, from the surrounding circumstances, that there were Blacks in these other cars. So, why weren't they attacked by their fellow Blacks? Why was the attack only on two Whites?
#                          #                                #
ANOTHER ADMINISTRATIVE ERROR FROM CITY HALL


At tomorrow night's City Council meeting, the Council will hear an appeal  by Wendy Leece against the Planning Commission's approval  to put in a Starbucks at 450 E. 17th Street.

So far so good.

However, the Council gets to hear this matter on a de novo basis.

Still good so far.

But, in the agenda [HERE], it appears that the Council is being told by staff that it has only two options set forth as A and B:

Either approve of what the Planning Commission did or reject it.

That's the problem.

Under a de novo hearing, the Council actually has the ability to set new conditions or modify the ones set by the Planning Commission.  In other words, there is a third choice, but the agenda report doesn't reflect this except down in the Conclusion section which does correctly state this.

The Council should be told that it has a third option: C.
#                           #                                       #


GERMAN PIRATE PARTY ON THE RISE

What we're seeing all across Europe is the rise of political parties and politicians who are rejecting austerity. It's happening in France and Greece and now in Germany.

Some of these anti-austerity parties and politicians are on the left and some are on the right.  What they share is the belief that it is wrong to impose austerity measures on ordinary citizens while a few very rich people (internationalists) continue to profit.

Can we expect the same in the U.S.?

Our guess is that we can expect the same, and that in the elections at all levels this year in the U.S., politicians who call for austerity measures that hurt ordinary citizens are going to have a hard time getting elected.

The public mood is one in which voters have swung back to wanting a chicken in every pot and a car in every garage. Smart politicians are going to find a way to meet this mood. Dumb politicians are going to be looking for work elsewhere outside of politics.
#                     #                                   #
AGENDA FOR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TONIGHT

Major item is a proposal for a recycling center on Placentia.
#                        #                                #

No comments:

Post a Comment

 http://frankspeech.com/