I just got a telephone call about a possible movie deal on one of my books. I've heard that before, about another of my books and it didn't go anywhere, so I'm not holding my breath.
# # #
WALK LIKE A EUROPEAN (CUE THE MUSIC)
OF WHITE EUROPEAN ANCESTRY? YOU MAY SHARE YOUR DNA WITH KING TUT. OF MODERN EGYPTIAN ANCESTRY? SORRY, YOU'RE PROBABLY NOT RELATED TO KING TUT
Short video.
# # #
TV ANCHOR GIVES THE FACTS ABOUT PIERS MORGAN'S ANTI-GUN CLAIMS
Actually, the anchor only gives the PC facts. The reality is that the gun homicide rate in the U.S. should be further broken down by race/ethnicity for the complete picture.
And, what would that picture show? It would show that most criminal gun homicides in the U.S. involve non-Whites as the shooters.
White America is still as peaceful as it ever was. Non-White America is what is giving us higher violent crime rates.
If you doubt us, just compare the violent crime statistics from places such as overwhelmingly White New Hampshire with overwhelmingly non-White places such as Detroit or any other city with a small White population but a large Black population.
The statistics don't lie.
Genes are us.
# # #
TWO INVISIBLE MEN ROB FIVE PLACES IN BUENA PARK
In the above story and video in the OC REGISTER you'll hear that the Buena Park PD wants you to let them know if you see the suspects who are described as two men wearing hoodies.
Now, what the hell good is that description? How about the race of the suspects? Right. You already know that when the race of violent suspects isn't given it means that they're non-White and usually Black.
Maybe one reason newspapers are in decline is that they no longer give readers the who, why, what, where, when and sometimes how about stories.
Newspapers and the establishment continue to hide the facts from the public about violent crime by not giving full descriptions of violent criminals.
# # #
LOOK AT THIS SILLY ATTEMPT TO SMEAR JOHN BRENNAN WHO HAS BEEN NOMINATED TO HEAD THE CIA
It's a very short column, but gives a good example of the type of neocon propaganda that fills the press these days.
In the headline, the writer sets up his premise by telling readers that Brennan is the most "dangerous" man to ever be CIA director. Then, the writer refers to Brennan as an "Arabist."
To prove that Brennan is dangerous, the writer then gives a few examples that really don't make his case at all, but the writer wants you to think they do by giving you his own biased conclusions.
For example, here's a short excerpt from the column:
In his 34-minute speech, Brennan never mentions groups like the Holy Land Foundation, which was a terrorist front for Islamist causes, and essentially begs his hosts for their approval with statements like these:
In all my travels the city I have come to love most is al-Quds, Jerusalem …
We are not waging a war against terrorism …
He says that Brennan has never mentioned "groups like the Holy Land Foundation, which was a terrorist front for Islamist causes," and the writer uses this non-mention to imply that Brennan isn't against terrorism.
Of course, Brennan didn't mention a lot of things, so what? Then, the writer tells readers that Brennan "begs his hosts" (who probably have terrorists among them, right?) for their approval with the two sentence fragments above in blue. Do those sound like begging? Of course not.
# # #
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You see what the writer has done, right?
As we said above, this is the type of propaganda that neocons often use. They take the most innocent things said by someone, and then surround those innocent statements with charged or loaded words such as "dangerous," "terrorists," and "begs" and then they try to lead a reader to accept the writer's twisted characterization of what was actually said after infusing the column with all the negative connotations.
It's just a rehash of the old "She's a witch and we all know that witches are evil. Why haven't you condemned her as a witch? Hmmm. You must then be in favor of witches. Say, you may also be a witch."
The necons do the same thing by throwing around the term "anti-Semite." One can criticize any government or nation on Earth and everyone correctly takes that as free speech and fair comments about something of concern, but let anyone criticize the government of Israel and out come the cries of "anti-Semite."
Don't fall for the neocon propaganda, folks. The neocons are not working in America's best interests.
# # #
# # #
No comments:
Post a Comment