CM PRESS # 101

NICE COLUMN BY ROBERT S. GRIFFIN ON THE CONTINUING ATTEMPTS TO DESTROY WHITES 

From the column:
"White racial identity, interests, commitment, solidarity, leadership, organization, and collective action?  Absolutely not.  That’s for other races, not White people. Pound that into their heads with the public discourse you dominate."
#                       #                               #
LONG ARTICLE IN THE OC REGISTER ABOUT WOMEN IN COMBAT

You've probably heard most of the arguments pro and con about allowing women in combat, so we won't rehash them here.  We think most of the arguments, on both sides, miss the real deeper significance of  nature's built-in differences between men and women of our species--which we have for the survival, improvement and expansion of the species.

Here's the CM PRESS argument against letting women serve in combat: In the struggle for survival of our species, men are infinitely more expendable than women, and, as such, the species can lose many more men than women, and not only survive, but also prosper.

Here's the detail supporting our above argument and conclusion

Women receive their eggs all at one time in their lives and then they produce no more.  Every month, they automatically offer up an egg for fertilization.  If the egg is fertilized, the woman is out of the egg business for about 9 months.  Thus, generally, one woman equals one child every nine months.

In addition, relatively early in her life, a woman's eggs are all gone, so she must produce children when she's young.  The eggs are also fresher when she's young. It is also the young who go into combat, so women would be going into combat during their most fertile years.

Men, on the other hand, produce sperm constantly, and keep doing so until they die.  A man can impregnate many women in a single day.

Thus, one man and many women are all that's needed to keep the species going.

In other words, men and their sperm are a dime a dozen and women and their eggs are far more precious.

With us so far?

Okay, now why would nature set things up like the above? If, as many people want us to believe, men and women are basically the same and both should serve in combat and risk dying, why has nature made men and women so different in their ability to help propagate the species?

The people who think that men and women are basically the same are wrong.

It all comes down to the way nature has designed us for the survival of our species, and also for its expansion and evolution.

The reason nature gives a woman all her eggs at one time is to keep the eggs and their DNA code stable and relatively unchanged. Once she gets her eggs, the DNA code within them is set.

But, what if the conditions on the Earth change markedly, say, it gets very hot or very cold?

Well, in that case, nature needs to be able to make changes to the DNA code so that babies will be born who are better adapted to the new conditions.  How does it do this?  Simple. It makes changes to the man's sperm. You may be aware that almost all mutations that happen in our species come from the male side of the equation. That's for a purpose. In fact, a man's sperm is changed by temperature, emotional stress, cosmic rays and many other things.

But, what if the sudden changes to the Earth are only temporary?  Nature wouldn't want humans to produce children all covered with fur if sudden cold was only going to last for several hundred years.  No problem. The woman's eggs, which, remember, remain stable, are a brake on too many rapid  changes to the DNA code.

Here's some more detail on the detail, but this isn't necessary for an understanding of our argument and conclusion

The recipe to make each of us is the DNA code that is within each cell of our body. It is composed of approximately 3.1 billion combinations of the four chemicals of DNA, usually abbreviated as A,T,C,G. 

These 3.1 billion combinations have sections called genes. In humans, there are approximately 20,000 genes. The genes largely determine who and what we are. As an aside, we might  think of the genes as being similar to a recipe for a cake and the environment as the oven.  

And, all of the above--the DNA letters and the genes--are then organized into 46 chromosomes in our species. 

When a male and female of our species mates, the new child receives half of all of the above from each parent. Thus, the new child will receive 23 chromosomes from the father and 23 from the mother, and each of the two sets of 23 chromosomes will contain approximately 1.5 billion combinations of A,T,C,G and 10,000 genes. 

So, with the above further detail, you can see that a new child who is conceived will theoretically receive
half of its code from the father and half from the mother and this will allow some changes to enter the picture, but not too many.
#                                   #                                          #