CM PRESS # 113

GOP HEAD SAYS THE PARTY MUST BE THE PARTY FOR EVERYONE

Yawn.  All his statement does is point out the problem with our two party political system:  both parties have to try to appeal to the masses clustered under the center of the bell curve in order to get people elected.

So, what's the point of even having two parties?  The only ones who benefit are the elected officials of both parties.  They run campaigns not based on principles, because they really don't have any principles other than to try to get on the gravy train.

We need to reform our whole political system so that smaller parties actually have a chance of electing people to office.

In much of Europe, smaller parties actually represent particular constituencies and if their constituencies are large enough, they get people elected.  This is almost impossible to do in the U. S. because of the way the system is set up.
#                                           #                     #
4.7% OF NEBRASKA'S POPULATION IS BLACK, BUT BLACKS COMMITTED 80% OF THE MURDERS IN NEBRASKA IN 2012

Must be the fault of Whites.
#                          #                                   #
COLLECTION OF KLITSCHKO BROTHERS' KNOCKOUTS

Short video of the two Klitschkos engaged in the family business.
#                        #                                     #
911 CALLS RELEASED ON BLACK MOB RACE ATTACK ON TWO WHITE REPORTERS

Video.

Notice how the establishment tries to cover up the racial nature of the attack.

Don't be fooled, folks.  In life you have to play the odds to survive, and playing the odds means that you have to have some understanding of the odds.

Whites are constantly being attacked by Blacks all across this country.  Most of the attacks are covered up.
#                                   #                                 #

ON THE ONE HAND YOU HAVE SOME PEOPLE SAYING THAT THERE ARE TOO MANY PEOPLE ON THE EARTH AND THEN ON THE OTHER HAND YOU HAVE PEOPLE SAYING IT IS UP TO US TO HELP PEOPLE IN PRIMITIVE TRIBES STAY ALIVE

In this unctuous column HERE in the Daily Pilot written by someone named Liana Papirian, you'll read that we in the First World are supposed to help people in the Third World because people in the Third World are dying for lack of modern medical care.

Well, if we have an overpopulation problem on the Earth, then why should we collectively try to keep people alive who can't take care of themselves?  Shouldn't we let nature take its course?

Should we in the First World hold down our birthrate and  perhaps go extinct so people who can't take care of themselves live to have more children to increase the population?  This is nothing less than societial dysgenesis.

Papirian writes: "Most tribes like the way they are leading their lives, but it is up to our government to make sure these people are assisted medically and technologically if need be."

It is?  It's up to our government, which has no money except what it gets from the citizens of the U.S.
to help people in other nations medically and technologically?  Why is that our responsibility?  We have poor people in Appalachia, right here in the U.S. who can use help.  Why not help them?

We also often hear how there is mass starvation in some Third World countries.  So, what do some of the Great White Mothers and Great White Fathers do?  They rush in and feed people.  Then, those people have more children so the next year there is even more starvation and the suffering increases and continues on.

Nature has things set up so that there is a competition as to who survives and who doesn't. It's called natural selection.  When humans, often  full of compassion, kindness and good intentions, upset the natural balance, there is a price to pay.  That payment may not be exacted immediately or in a few years or even in decades, but at some point it will be paid.

Maybe the above is too abstruse and sounds too harsh.

Try this as a metaphor.  At every sports stadium, there are good seats and bad seats.  Who should get the good seats and on what basis?  The way we decide this is by competition.  The good seats cost more, so those who want them "compete" by paying the higher price.  Isn't that fair?  It is completely in tune with nature and nature's ways.

It works that way throughout nature.  Not everyone can have the best seats.

Now, to be clear, Ms. Papirian and those of like mind are completely free to go help anyone they want.  God bless them. Go to it.  Have fun.  Feel as though you are leading a purposeful life.

What I take issue with is the guilt-trip being put on all of us and the suggestion that we are all somehow responsible for the plight of people in faraway lands and that we should all spend our time and money to help them.

Go help them Ms. Papirian.  Do it on your own time and with your own dime.
#                         #                             #
FRANCE'S RICHEST MAN JOINS OTHER RICH FRENCH AND MOVES TO BELGIUM

France's top 75% tax rate not sitting well with those who have to pay it.

If California didn't have such nice weather, we'd be seeing many more people moving to less taxed states. But in Europe, there's no big difference in weather from France on this side of the road and Belgium on the other side.
#                         #                                  #