![]() |
| BFF Sandy Genis & Greg Ridge They like supersized government with redundant employees. |
We just got a no on Measure V flyer here at CMPRESS HQ and it has a photo of Greg Ridge--who used to comment all the time in the newspapers as Gericault.
Correct us if we're wrong, but isn't Ridge one of the CMFROGS who constantly try to tell everyone that they have nothing to do with the unions who are spending big bucks to defeat Measure V and the 3Ms?
The reason we ask is because the flyer we received says it was "Sponsored by Orange County Employees Association ID # 1346919, 830 N. Ross Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701"
# # #
THIS JUST IN--ANOTHER PHOTO FROM LAST NIGHT'S CHARTER DEBATE# # #
| ZZZ-Zzzz-ZZZzzz-libDzzem--zzZZZ |
At last night's charter debate, Katrina Foley kept telling the audience how much she likes Newport Beach's charter.
Foley also has her office in Newport Beach, and she has reportedly pulled her kids out of Costa Mesa schools and put them in Newport Beach schools.
So, it seems that Foley's only link to Costa Mesa is that she sleeps here.
Hey Katrina, why don't you just move to Newport Beach?
# # #
MEMO TO THE 3MS AND THE GOOD COUNCILMEMBERS
.jpg)
We've been discovered.
Geoff West [read the comments below this article in the DP] has learned that you guys are all taking orders from me.
Now, I'm not sure how he learned this, but do you remember when I had you all meet me in the field down by the pig sty and one of the pigs kept inching closer to us as I was giving you instructions? Right.
But, there's more. This character West has a very weak wall between his subconscious mind and his conscious mind and the Freudian slips keep bubbling up to the surface. In one of the comments this guy makes, he refers to "bacon," I mean, what could be clearer?
In another comment, but this isn't relevant here, except to point out his frequent subconscious thoughts coming out, West, who has never had children, calls Jim Righeimer "the sperm donor" of the charter. I kid you not.
Well, I'll let these photos speak for themselves.
In the future, I'll be sending you guys my instructions via your decoder rings so this guy won't catch on.
/s/ He Who Shall Not Be Named
# # #
| Foley asleep on her feet? |
FOLEY SHOWS HER CONFUSION ABOUT HOW OUR GOVERNMENT WORKS
Can it be that Katrina Foley, who spent years on the City Council, simply doesn't understand that our form of government is a representative democracy?
Can she not know that we elect representatives to make decisions, and that it has always been that way in Costa Mesa since the city was first incorporated (and also in every other city that we know about in most states)?
At last night's charter debate, Foley kept coming back to the fact that the charter gives power to a majority of three on the City Council. So what? That's the way it is now and that's the way it has always been. The charter doesn't change that.
Foley simply had no good arguments and every one that she made was countered with facts and truth by Jim Righeimer.
The real reason for the controversy
The babe in the lowrider paint job suit got to the nub of the controversy in Costa Mesa when she asked Righeimer if the controversy about the charter is simply because some people don't like him.
And, of course, that is precisely the reason.
Those opposed to the charter are from Venus and Righeimer is from Mars. Righeimer hasn't had a group hug with them and he hasn't walked around with teary eyes while holding a candle and singing kumbaya. That's why they don't like him. He's not touchy feely enough for this sad crew of do-nothings.
Look, here's the reality, many of those opposed to the charter are women and they have a feminine world view driven by estrogen (which has them care more about feelings than results). And, some of the pantywaist men (no, they're not all pantywaists) who are opposed to it are males who seem to lack testosterone.
By contrast, many of those in favor of the charter have a more masculine world view and they like Righeimer because he gets things done. Righeimer is results oriented, not feelings oriented.
You won't find Righeimer sitting around under the hair dryer all day talking about his feelings before pounding in a nail; he'll simply pick up a hammer and pound the nail in.
And, when he pounds the nail in and does it correctly, the Venus folks are all aghast that he didn't share his feelings with them before pounding in that nail and they are upset that he didn't have a committee formed to talk about if for six months.
Bam. Job done. It's fixed. Boo hoo, whaaaaaa, the big bad man didn't share his feelings. Whaaaaaaa.
# # #
IN CASE YOU MISSED OUR PRO-CHARTER COLUMN THAT THE DAILY PILOT TURNED INTO A LETTER AND BURIED UNDER A GENERAL LETTERS HEADING ABOUT BIKE LANES...
Here's what the Daily Pilot ran on Saturday (2 paragraphs)...[LINK]
Keep Sacramento out of Costa Mesa
Letting the politicians in Sacramento have the say on every bit of minutiae in Costa Mesa is like having an apartment complex with hundreds of apartments but with all the controls for the TV, the heating and air conditioning, and the hot and cold water for the shower up in the Sacramento penthouse, where a small group of elites will decide what is right for them and then force that on all the other apartment dwellers.
Thank you very much, elites up in the Sacramento penthouse, but I'm an adult and I'll control my own TV, my own heating and air conditioning, and also the hot and cold water in my shower. You do not know what is best for me, so butt out.
M. H. Millard
Costa Mesa
Here's the above as we submitted it (12 paragraphs)...
Why I'm Pro Charter
by M. H. Millard
I believe that government that is small and closest to the
people is generally the best. I like every smidgen of local control that we can
wrest from bloated, faraway Sacramento (also from D.C., but that's for a different
column).
To me, letting the politicians in Sacramento
have the say on every bit of minutiae in Costa Mesa is like having an apartment
complex with hundreds of apartments but with all the controls for the TV, the
heating and air-conditioning, and the hot and cold water for the shower located
up in the Sacramento Penthouse where a small group of elites will decide
what is right for them and then force that on all the other apartment dwellers.
Thank you very much elites up in the Sacramento Penthouse,
but I'm an adult and I'll control my own TV, my own heating and
air-conditioning, and also the hot and cold water in my shower. You do
not know what is best for me, you folks up there in the Sacramento Penthouse,
so butt out.
I've seen a few arguments against the charter and they
mostly seem to be of three general types:
The proposed charter is a Cut and Paste Job--Well,
yes, that's how all contracts and legal documents are crafted. No one starts
with a blank piece of paper. When drafting such documents you find
clauses already in existence which have passed legal muster and you use them in
your new document.
One of the City Council candidates who opposes the charter
is an attorney (as he tells everyone at every opportunity). Ask him how he puts
together contracts. If he's truthful, he'll tell you that he has all the
clauses in his computer and he cuts and pastes. No one with any sense
tries to reinvent the wheel.
The proposed charter will put too much power in the hands
of the City Council---Nope. The Council already has the power to do
what it thinks is necessary to govern Costa Mesa. They derive that power
from us. The charter simply gives the people of Costa Mesa a little more
power, which we will exercise through our elected representatives.
Except in small villages and towns, usually found in rural
New England, we do not have pure democracies. The reason we don't is
because with larger populations it makes no sense to have all the voters show
up at Town Meetings to vote whether or not to spend $ 13.45 to buy Old Bob the
street cleaner a new snow shovel or not. Instead, we have representative
democracies. We vote for representatives--in our case, City Council
members--and they figure out whether or not to buy Old Bob his snow shovel.
And if you've ever seen a City Council meeting in Costa Mesa
where you have men showing up in Tutus, people shouting down speakers they
don't agree with, people singing while at the podium, other people talking
about drilling oil wells when the subject is the city budget, and all the rest,
you'll get an idea why a pure democracy wouldn't work in a city the size of
Costa Mesa. It's like a scene out of Marat/ Sade. Poor Old Bob would be
down to a shovel with no blade and the citizens still wouldn't have decided
whether or not to buy him a new shovel. You'd quickly become a fan of our
lack of snow and our representative government.
The proposed charter wasn't the product of a committee of
citizens-- So what? Here's a heads up on how the real world works.
Often times when those running a City form a non-blue-ribbon committee of
ordinary citizens, with no real experience in the subject being discussed, it
is a purely psychological move to give the appearance that everyone
contributed, and thus have citizens buy into whatever is decided even
though they have usually been manipulated to a certain decision that was
made beforehand and they really didn't contribute anything.
Instead of wasting our time on an illusory, feel-good,
committee, we will now have the opportunity to vote up or down on a well
written charter in November.
Here's something else. Some of the folks who oppose the
charter remind me of some of the Loyalists who wanted the colonies to remain
part of England. Read some of the history of that era and you'll see what
I mean. Same types of personalities. Same arguments.
To repeat. On election day, you can vote for a little more
freedom and local control for Costa Mesa by voting for the charter, or you can
vote to have Sacramento dictate to us. It's no more complicated than
that.
# # #
A FEW PHOTOS FROM LAST NIGHT'S CHARTER DEBATE IN WHICH JIM RIGHEIMER TROUNCED AN UNPREPARED AND FLUSTERED KATRINA FOLEY
| Any day now |
| Outside the debate room |
| Katrina Foley with double chins |
| Jeffrey Harlan talking to a Q-Tip |
| Intro by woman wearing paint job from a low rider |


I also attended last night's FTTF forum and found it exhilarating. For some twisted, sick reason, I really enjoyed watching a man beat the crap (figuratively of course) out of a woman. Well, she is not just any woman, she is former city council member, ultra liberal lawyer who had a major role for many of our fiscal problems in Costa Mesa today. Recently on Facebook she accused Righeimer of having a big ego and this charter was all about him, yet my experience of her from the moment I started watching council meetings, her ego often dwarfs any in the room. On several occasions I tried to have a conversation with her and she acted so self-important that she would not even stop to talk. Numerous attempts to formally meet with her when she was a council member and discuss problems in the city were all ignored. I eventually gave up.
ReplyDeleteMs. Foley frequently accuses the council majority of having its mind made up before listening to the citizens but what she does not understand is our representative form of government requires our elected officials to do what is right for all the people, not be swayed by a group of vocal fanatics. My experience has been the current council does listen and does give the courtesy to discuss an issue with anyone any time any place. They may not agree with you but at least they are respectful and give their time. Foley is so full of herself and self-involved, she has no business being in politics. Ironically I voted for her when she ran for the school board, not because she was the best candidate, but to get her the hell out of the city council.
So you ask, did I enjoy watching Righeimer systematically disassemble this lawyer who sounded more like a dingbat rather than a good spokesperson for the opposition? You are damn right I did!!
To all those "No on V" folks, this forum did more to hurt your cause than to help it so I thank you for that. I was also pleased to see only people leaving the building holding "Yes on V" signs.