Wednesday, April 25, 2012

CM PRESS # 838

TN:  WHITE GIRL NOT ALLOWED INTO HER SENIOR PROM BECAUSE SHE WAS WEARING A CONFEDERATE FLAG DRESS

Above linked article says there have been "race-related issues" at the school in the past and that school officials felt this dress could cause a problem.

"Race-related issues," means some Black students might not like the dress.  So, the rights of this White girl were trampled on by school officials to placate some Black students.

What do you bet if a Black girl wore a "kill the crackers" dress or something similar that there would have been no problem and that everyone would correctly say that this is a free expression issue?

The larger issue here is that in order to never offend any minorities, America is forcing Whites to give up their rights.

Will America survive as the land of the free while trying to be all things to all people and offending no one?

It's doubtful.
#                             #                                           #
UPDATE:  ONE ARREST MADE IN BLACK MOB ATTACK ON A LONE WHITE MAN


Cops, as usual, can't seem to find a hate crime in the attack.

Suppose 20 White men beat up a lone Black man sitting on his porch; do you think the cops might find a hate crime in this case?
#                         #                              #
PSST--IT'S REALLY IN COSTA MESA

You know that 10 acre parcel on Monrovia in Costa Mesa that is close enough to Newport Beach  for our geezers to toss their Geritol bottles over the border to their geezers?  Well, as you read this, the developer is setting up an event tent (or could it be Cherokees?) on site, probably for a big ground breaking PR splash.

We didn't get an invitation, so we guess that's what it's about.  The no parking signs around the site let us know that whatever is going on will be happening up until 3 pm today.

We'll probably see photos of the usual Costa Mesa political poseurs in the Daily Pilot tomorrow about this event.

Apparently, the development is going to be marketed as luxury apartments to senior citizens and will be called Vivante.  Anyway, we went to the Vivante Living website  HERE and looked  for anything that mentions Costa Mesa as the location of the new luxury senior housing.

We couldn't find anything that says it's in Tiamesa, er, Costajuana, ah, Costa Mesa. Not a word.

Mostly, we read that the leasing office is in Newport Beach and we read about lots of things in Newport Beach along with some things in Costa Mesa, but, again, we couldn't find any information that the site is actually in Costa Mesa.

Probably just an oversight.  Sort of like the oversight of South Coast Metro forgetting to mention that it is also in Costa Mesa. And, probably like that oversight of Nike saying it was in Newport Beach, when it was actually in Triangle Square which, of course, is in Costa Mesa.


Even though Costa Mesa isn't mentioned, we think this project will be great for the Westside Bluffs and Costa Mesa generally and may help spur the transition of the Westside.

Directly across the street from this project on Monrovia are some single story industrial buildings, and we expect that some may start converting to retail uses to serve the needs of the seniors who will lease in Vivante.  This is a good thing.


Coastline College


A little further down on Monrovia, and actually on the Newport Beach side of the border, the Coastline College building is taking shape, and we're impressed with the architecture which is modern and just unusual enough to create some visual interest in that area. Our guess is that Coastline is not hiding the fact that they're in Newport Beach.

Is it time to fold Costa Mesa into Newport Beach?


We've written about this many times over the years.  With upscale projects wanting to hide the name Costa Mesa, shouldn't we really give some thought to seeing if we can become part of Newport Beach?
#                                         #                                          #




FUNNY, YOU DON'T LOOK INDIAN
Not an Indian

by H. Millard (c) 2012

"Hey Bro, ya wanna git jiggy wif one o' my Injun rugs?" said the Black man selling Indian rugs in Oklahoma.

Maybe such a scene never really happened. But, it might have. No matter. One imagines that such a scene or similar ones were in the minds of the 76% of the Cherokee Nation who voted not long ago to strip non-Cherokees of membership in the tribe.

This story actually starts back in 1838 in North Carolina, Tennessee and Georgia when the feds forced the Cherokees to migrate to Oklahoma.  When the Cherokees left their traditional lands, some took their black slaves with them. 

Then, when slavery was abolished, the blacks were given citizenship in the Cherokee nation.

Today, there are almost 3,000 descendents of these freed slaves living with the Cherokees in Oklahoma.

If the vote stands to limit membership in the tribe to those with Cherokee blood, it will be primarily these descendents of black slaves who will be booted out of the tribe, but others including some whites and some members of other Indian tribes will also be affected.
Cherokees, no less than any other distinct peoples, are what they are because of their genes.

And, it seems the Cherokees understand this.

If pure blood male and female Cherokees mate--23 Cherokee chromosomes from the male and 23 from the female join together. At that moment of joining--when there are 46 chromosomes together, the life process starts its trajectory that will result in the birth of a new full blooded, genuine Cherokee.

Mating within your group--like with like--is the way all distinct peoples keep from going extinct.  There's no other way to do it.

Of course, over the past 100 or so years, there has been a lot of intermarriage among Cherokees, just as among other distinct peoples, as the blending philosophy of this age has caused people to not see themselves or their people as being unique and worth preserving.

It's not difficult to see how a people goes extinct through the bedroom genocide of mating outside the group.

A pureblood Cherokee mates with a black or a white or an Asian and the child produced is only half Cherokee i.e. the new child has 23 Cherokee chromosomes and 23 non-Cherokee Chromosomes. Then, if that child grows up and mates with a non-Cherokee, the child born is only one quarter Cherokee. If that child also mates with a non-Cherokee the next child is only one eighth Cherokee.  Then it becomes one sixteenth and so on.  Of course, it's a bit more complicated than that, but that's the rough idea.

Soon, you have a tribe of "Indians" who, depending on how the mating went, may look like Scandinavians or African-Americans or whatever but not much like genuine Cherokees. 
Despite feathers, also not an
Indian

The blond, blue eyed Scandinavian Cherokees may put feathers on their heads, but they sure as hell aren't Cherokees no matter what they call themselves. Their genes have been too watered down.

If you don't look Cherokee, you're not Cherokee. Same with all other peoples. Trust your eyes.


So, what's to be done to save the Cherokees from extinction?  


The Cherokees, themselves, have to want to save themselves.  No one else is going to do it for them.  This vote, to oust the descendants of former slaves, if it stands, could be a big step away from extinction.

Of course, to really stave off extinction, the Cherokees have to have their consciousness raised even higher as to who is a Cherokee and who isn't.  If the right level of consciousness is achieved, social taboos against breeding outside the group should foster some reproductive isolation.

And, with reproductive isolation will come a folding back in of those members of the tribe who may have mixed blood, so that the mixed blood will begin reversing itself in a sort of distillation process. 

What the Cherokees are trying to do is to go back to a period before miscegenation and alien genes were inserted into their tribe and start from there.  In other words, they want to go back to a time before the fork in the road that led to their tribe now having many non-Cherokees as members.

With their vote on expelling non-Cherokees from the tribe, the Cherokees said that only those who can show that they are blood descendents of those who were on the Cherokee rolls back in about 1898 can be members of the tribe. 

Now, obviously, the genes of  some who are descended from those on the old Cherokee rolls may have been watered down in some lines over the past hundred or so years, but if the Cherokees hold firm with their vote even though they are being called racists, and if they stand up to the pressure of the blenders, then they may be able to revive themselves as a distinct people. 

In 2000, the Seminoles did something similar to what the Cherokees are now trying to do, but then the feds cut off federal money that the Seminoles had been receiving and the Seminoles caved in.  In effect, the Seminoles accepted money to commit their own genocide. 

Will the Cherokees sell their genes for money?  Time will tell. 

You may not hear many Cherokees talking about this in the terms I've used here, but, if you cut through the sagebrush, this really is about self-identification, self-determination and survival as a distinct people and not going extinct.

And, there are lessons here for all distinct peoples who want to survive the blending that is being forced on humanity.
#  #  #
Those are my opinions and I stand behind them.





No comments:

Post a Comment

 http://frankspeech.com/