UH OH, I GET OUTED AGAIN BY THIS CHARACTER ON YOUR LEFTUnder my column/letter in the Daily Pilot (also seen below), this lonely and sad character comments that he wants readers to be sure to read some of my essays on subjects concerning crime, survival, evolution, genocide and philosophy.
Please do read them. I write to be read and I don't pull the punches.
In fact, if you want to read more, be sure to get some copies of my books.
HERE'S A COLUMN* THAT WE SENT TO THE DAILY PILOT AND WHICH IS IN THE PAPER TODAY [scroll down under the letter on Water Conservation to read it over there]
City Council now has some doers
The representatives of the people of Costa Mesa are our City Council members. They are our only elected officials and the only officials in the city who are directly responsible to the people.
They are elected to make sure the unelected municipal government is doing what needs to be done to make our city the great place it should be.
I bring this up because now that we have three people on the council who are actually taking a hands-on approach to improving Costa Mesa by doing what they were elected to do, we seem to have a small group of political opponents and chronic malcontents who reflexively complain about everything that these doers are doing and who try to convince voters that these doers are somehow out of line for doing what they were elected to do.
Over the years, we've had too many passive council members who did nothing but show up for meetings, rubber stamp whatever staff put in front of them, collect their checks and go home. Their way of doing the public's business was to not question anything, not do anything, just go along to get along.
This caused a deterioration in some parts of the city. Roads weren't being paved. Gangs controlled certain neighborhoods. Things that needed to be done just weren't being done. In that environment, some city employees were pretty much able to do whatever they wanted to do.
And some employee groups seemingly worked overtime to keep electing City Council members who would repay this support by letting the employees run the city and get raises and benefits paid for by the residents.
Now we have some council members who are running the city like a business. They are taking a hands-on approach. They're asking questions and not just rubber-stamping things.
They're taking care of the deferred maintenance of our streets and neighborhoods. They're letting the employees know that it is the council that is in charge, not the employees.
By the way, many of our employees, including police officers, don't live in Costa Mesa and can't vote on local issues. They should not be dictating to those of us who do live here and who can vote here.
And speaking of running the city like a business, what does that really mean? Well, bosses who want the business to succeed take an interest in actually managing the enterprise.
To do that, they investigate what employees are doing on the job. They make suggestions on how to do things better. They decide on priorities.
But this raises the question: How do we determine if a city is a success? The answer is found in the statistics relating to various quality-of-life issues and by comparing the statistics to those of surrounding cities. It makes sense to compare Costa Mesa to the five surrounding cities that actually touch some part of it: Santa Ana, Huntington Beach, Irvine, Newport Beach and Fountain Valley.
So how are we doing as a city? Better than some in some ways and not as good as others in other ways. But, and here's the important point, we are doing better now than we were just a few years ago before we elected some doers to the council.
Things are now trending in the right direction no matter what the political malcontents and employee associations trying to retain their power to run the city and control the council are trying to tell you.
M.H. Millard
Costa Mesa
-------------*The Pilot edited out some stuff, including a sentence based on numbers that we got from the City that show that more than 75% of our police officers don't choose to live in Costa Mesa, yet the police union keeps putting thousands of dollars into trying to elect puppets to the Council in a you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours scenario that is not for the benefit of the taxpaying citizens of Costa Mesa who DO actually live here and who contribute to our city by shopping here and being involved in the community.
The Pilot also turned this column into a letter and buried it where readers might miss it.
And, the Pilot removed our tag line that M. H. Millard is the author of several books and publishes the CM PRESS.
Oh well, the folks at the Pilot are running the show over there, so we're not really complaining and we're pleased that they at least did run this someplace in the paper, but we did want to clarify these few points about this column.
# # #
Column from WND
Summary of column: Ordinary Whites are starting to reject the media cover-up of Black on White violence and are beginning to clearly state that the violence isn't from some plain-wrap, no-race "teens," or "youths," or "kids," but is from Blacks, and the violence isn't aimed at equally plain-wrap, no race "victims," but is aimed at Whites.
It is racial violence perpetrated by Blacks against Whites. Of course, even the WND column pulls punches by focusing on Black "mobs," who attack Whites instead of making the point that it is also Black individuals who are doing the same thing.
The reality of most violent crime in America and in all similarly "diverse" nations is that it is Blacks attacking Whites and not the other way around, as the lefty media still wants dumbed down Whites to believe.
# # #
IN GENOME RESEARCH SOME LEFTIES ARE AFRAID OF A NEW RACISM
The goofy PC belief that race is just a social construct is being deep-sixed as scientists learn even more about DNA.
The reality: There is not just one race, the human race, as lefties want you to believe. There is a human species and it is divided into races, which can even be called sub-species.
# # #
THE WORLD'S TEN HAPPIEST COUNTRIES
Now, what do you think they have in common?
# # #
THE BLENDING AWAY OF A DISTINCT PEOPLE
There are some misguided Utopians who believe that the Earth would be a better place if all races, all nations and all religions could just be blended together to create a new Tan Everyman who would have a little of all races in him/her, whose religion would have few rough edges or commands to do or not do some things that might offend others, and who would be a citizen of the planet instead of a citizen of a particular nation.
Some of us disagree with the Blenders (as I call them) and believe that distinct peoples should be allowed to their own self-identification and self-determination as they alone determine is best for them.
The above linked video (25 min) and article are about the blending away of the identity of one such distinct people, the Mapuche, of Argentina.
# # #
No comments:
Post a Comment