CM PRESS # 526

CANADA: ANTI-WHITE POLICE CHIEF SAYS DEPARTMENT IS TOO WHITE

Wants to get rid of White cops and replace them with non-White ones.

#                                                               #                                                       #

#                                 #                                                  #
CHICAGO MAY DOUBLE PROPERTY TAXES TO PAY FOR SPIRALING PENSION COSTS

Could this happen in Costa Mesa?  You bet.  Just elect liberals to the City Council like Wendy Leece and Katrina Foley.  Fortunately, Leece will be gone soon, but Foley is running.

Jim Righeimer and Steve Mensinger are against raising taxes and fees. They are the real thin blue line--protecting us from the creeps who want to raise our taxes and fees. Maybe that's one reason the haters--a small cadre of far left libs and lefties--constantly bad mouth them.

And, speaking of bad mouthing, when is CMPD management going to tell cops to be professional and stop bad mouthing Costa Mesa, the citizens of this city, and our elected officials?
#                                                     #                                  #
AUSTIN NEW AFRICA--BLACK TO BE CHARGED W/2COUNTS OF CAPITAL MURDER AFTER HE DROVE INTO A CROWD, KILLING 2 AND INJURING 23
#                                                #                                      #
BAD COPS COST BALTIMORE $245,000

They arrested a guy who was legally filming them. He sued and won.
#                                                #                                              #
RAMZPAUL ON COMBAT HATE APP

Short video (3:16 min).
#                                              #                                       #
WISCONSIN NEW AFRICA--SIX BLACKS CHARGED IN 'ONE OF THE MOST DISTURBING CRIMES' POLICE CHIEF HAS EVER SEEN

From The Blaze.

Race of victims not given.  This usually means they're White.
#                               #                                              #
COLLEGE GROUP BANS WHITE PEOPLE FROM DIVERSITY 'HAPPY HOUR'

Whites not wanted.
#                                              #                                #
MEANWHILE....

The Daily Pilot--which constantly runs puff pieces on Latino issues, including one about a member of the Latino Legislative Caucus pushing a bill in Sacramento that will force Costa Mesa to abandon our at-large elections and hold Latino friendly gerrymandered district elections [HERE], told us they didn't think the following column was right for the paper.  Maybe it's just too White for the Pilot.

EUROPEAN-AMERICANS NEED A CAUCUS IN THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE

by M. H. Millard

It was recently announced that State Senator Marty Block, (D-San Diego), started the Legislative Jewish Caucus and that this caucus will also form a political action committee to raise money for Israel-friendly candidates. Block told the press that the Legislative Jewish Caucus "isn't a religious based organization.  We see this as an ethnic organization."  This statement was presumably made to both forestall Muslims from starting a Muslim Legislative Caucus and also to head off complaints that the Legislative Jewish Caucus is breaching the wall between religion and state.

At any rate, the Legislative Jewish Caucus, as an ethnic/racial organization, now joins the  Asian Pacific Islander Caucus, the Legislative Black Caucus and the Latino Legislative Caucus.

These caucuses work, sometimes behind the scenes and out of public view, to represent the interests of their ethnic/racial  groups.  They write legislation and take other actions on behalf of their particular ethnic/racial groups even though the people they are acting on behalf of may not live in their districts. In other words, unlike the traditional American political notion that people elected to public office represent a specific geographic area, these ethnic caucus members represent "their people," no matter where they live in the state.

An example of what the members of these ethnic/racial caucuses do was presented in the Daily Pilot recently in a story about State Assemblyman Roger Hernandez, a member of the Latino Legislative Caucus, who has authored a bill that would force cities such as Costa Mesa to end city wide voting and replace it with district voting.  District voting is a scheme that will lead to gerrymandered districts in Costa Mesa, in an attempt to include Latino voters in certain districts and exclude White voters from the districts.

On the welcome page of the Asian Pacific Islander Caucus we read this:  "[T]he Caucus was founded in 2001 and serves to represent and advocate for the interests of the APIA community...."

On the Website of the Latino Legislative Caucus we read: "The Mission of the California Latino Legislative Caucus is to identify, promote and advocate on behalf of the professional, educational, social, political and cultural interests of the Latino Community."

And, on the Website of the Legislative Black Caucus we read: "The continuing mission of the CLBC is to provide our unwavering commitment and support to our goal of achieving full inclusion of our state’s Africans American residents in every aspect of California life – from education and employment to housing and health to commerce and government services."

So, there you have it.  Four ethnic/racial organizations all advocating for the interests of their people.  Who advocates for White people?  No one.

Now, some who haven't kept up with the news may say that a White Legislative Caucus isn't needed because Whites are in the majority in the state.  Actually, we're not.  Latinos have ether reached numbers parity or have exceeded the size of the White population.  Some others may argue that Whites are not an ethnicity, but a race, and that we shouldn't lump the various White ethnicities (or people who originated in many different European nations) together under one rubric such as White.  Well, the Asian Pacific Islander Caucus lumps various Asian and Pacific Islander populations together, and the Legislative Black Caucus is based on race.  

I'll ask and answer this question once again:  Who represents Whites and White interests?  No one.

It's time to change that.  Will we now see some White legislators start a White Legislative Caucus?  Probably not.  Why?  Because Whites have been so brow beaten about race that it seems many are even afraid to order a gallon of white paint at the hardware store lest they be called racist.  The result of this racial intimidation that Whites have undergone for years is that Whites are left without any real representation for their particular interests (and we have many) in the state legislature.

Those timid souls who are so brow beaten that they run from the word "white," can simply use the term European-American if it makes them feel more comfortable.

#                          #                                                #

M. H. Millard is the author of several books, lives in Costa Mesa and publishes the CM PRESS blog.

#                       #                                                       #

FACT CHECK: (1)  Link to California State Legislature caucuses: http://www.legislature.ca.gov/the_state_legislature/leadership_and_caucuses/caucus.html

                           (2)  Link to The Sacramento Bee Capitol Alert (1/22/14) re: Jewish Caucus: http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2014/01/california-legislature-launches-a-jewish-caucus.html

                           (3) Link to Daily Pilot story on Hernandez:  http://www.dailypilot.com/news/tn-dpt-me-0221-council-districts-bill-20140220,0,1724640.story

#                            #                                          #