
THE PHILOSOPHY OF IMPROVEMENT IS SIMPLE:
COSTA MESA, DUE TO ITS CLOSENESS TO THE OCEAN AND IT'S TRADITIONAL SISTER CITY STATUS WITH NEWPORT BEACH, SHOULD BE A NICER CITY THAN IT IS AT PRESENT. THIS SHOULD BE REFLECTED IN VITAL STATISTICS THAT SHOW COSTA MESA IS CLOSER, IN THESE STATISTICS, TO NEWPORT BEACH THAN TO SANTA ANA.
A poster on the DP blog gets it right:
Better city wrote on Jan 3, 2008 7:52 PM:
---------------------
How do we know how we are doing as a city? The same way you tell if your child is sick or not: You check vital signs.
In the case of a child, this means you take his or her temperature.
If you didn't have something to compare that temperature to, it would be meaningless.
However, we know from years of comparisons with other humans that a normal temperature is around 98.6 degrees. If your child's temperature deviates from that, you can be reasonably sure the child is sick.
If the child is then taken to a doctor, blood or other tests may be performed. These are checked against what medical science knows is normal in humans.
Improvers generally say the same type of thinking is valid for checking Costa Mesa.
That's why the CM PRESS came up with the ring of cities concept. We check the vital signs of Costa Mesa and compare them to Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Ft. Valley, Irvine and Santa Ana.
These five cities all surround Costa Mesa and touch some part of our land. By looking at our home prices, crime rates, school scores, education levels, income levels, land use percentages, number of renters vs. owners, and much more, we can see how Costa Mesa is doing.
By using this scientific and objective method to quantify how we're doing, we remove the issue from the imprecise thinking that relies on adjectives and opinions instead of facts.
Here are two posts on this subject from the DP blog that illustrate why we should use facts and statistics to tell how Costa Mesa is doing. We have removed the posters' names out of a surfeit of kindness.
Notice in the following two posts, that very few meaningful facts are given. They're mostly fluff.
What you have in the above post is a strung together list of superlatives and adjectives (which we have put in bold face) with unsupported assertions of supposed fact. In other words, you have what sounds like a travel brochure or advertising copy. It's all empty opinion.
Here's another poster's entry:
# # #
Those are our opinions. Thanks for reading them.