TRUMP'S WEBSITE, FACEBOOK, TWEETS HERE
The Pope can't be a real Christian so long as he leaves that wall up all around the Vatican. Tear down that wall Pope Francis.
# # #
Welcome seekers after the truth and the meaning of life...
I AGREE WITH THE HATERS AND BIGOTS--YOU SHOULD READ WHAT I WRITE (IF YOU ARE REASONABLY INTELLIGENT, HAVE AN INTEREST IN THE BIG QUESTIONS AND THE SO-CALLED HUMAN CONDITION, AND HAVE AN OPEN MIND)
I write to be read.
I guess I should be appreciative that the haters and bigots are sending people to where they can find my writings, but it's too bad that the haters and bigots are too dumb to understand what they're reading and are so full of hate for White people, including hatred of themselves in some cases, and alienation from who and what they were born to be, that they have closed minds and mischaracterize my writings, or take things out of context, in order to try to prejudice readers and plant the mischaracterizations in their minds instead of letting new readers make up their own minds.
Some of the haters and bigots are trying to derail Westside improvement by ham handed attempts claiming I am a Neo-Nazi or White Supremacist or a member of the KKK or some other such groups (I'm not a member and never have been of any of these groups), and they then try to have people believe that because I support Westside improvement (in fact city wide improvement) that there must be some sort of hidden agenda. In logic, this is called an ad hominem fallacy--you attack the person, not the positions.
A more accurate characterization of me is that I am an unabashed advocate for White survival, and White interests and White civil rights. I also write extensively about the human condition and the big questions of existence. (Did you know that Whites are a very small minority on this planet and we are only about 10% of all humans? Let me do the math for the haters and bigots: This means that 90% of all humans are not White.) Let me say it again, I want Whites to survive and thrive and not go extinct.
These big questions of existence that I just mentioned are things such as Why is there existence at all? Why is there life? Why are there humans? Does human life or any life have a purpose? Why are there races? What is evolution? How does evolution work? What is the so-called human condition? Is there a God? If so, what is His/Its nature and what does He/It want? What happens when we die? Why have children? What is the essence of being a human? How should we comport ourselves? How should we relate to other humans? How do we survive in a world with ever changing conditions and ever changing dangers? What is genocide, and is it happening to us, right now? What is moral and ethical? How to live a good life and do what is right and good? And, so forth.
And, in my writings, I try to present my views in easily readable form, sometimes using fiction, sometimes using scientific facts. I also go to great pains trying to present my views and my answers to the big questions in non-academic and non-preachy terms with common words understood by most educated people.
You may agree with some of my views or you may not. That's your choice. If you don't like what you read, then just don't read it. It's no more complicated than that. If you like what you read, then continue doing so--I'm thankful and humbled. If you have an open mind and are also curious about existence, you might find a few things in my writings that ring a bell with you, or maybe not.
Clearly, not everyone is interested in the topics I cover and which interest me, and not everyone understands what they read, but if you're interested in the big questions, or the human condition, and if, again, you are reasonably intelligent and have an open mind, you might find some of my stuff mildly interesting and some of it may even cause you to start questioning various aspects of societal PC dogma that is fed us every day.
What you won't find in my writings is hate or so-called White supremacy as the tiny brain haters and bigots think you'll find. You will, however, find no holds barred treatments on crime and its relation to race and other things relating to humans and you will find frank discussions about the divergent paths of human evolution. I worship no sacred cows. You will also find talk of Whites having our own country and White Nationalism and White Separatism. But, again, you'll find no White Supremacy--in fact you'll find many of my essays even say that supremacy of any organism, across the board, is absurd because that's not the way nature and evolution work.
There's not much in my national and international stuff about politics or current events except as some of these things give me a jumping off point for delving into the big questions. In this regard, and as an example, one essay I wrote was called Avocado Supremacism [scroll down for that essay, which I've included here for your convenience], in which I discuss why and how Haas Avocados became the standard for guacamole.
But, of course, the column isn't really about guacamole. That was just my jumping off point to discuss general principles about genes and evolution and natural selection (involving a human hand, in this case, which at first makes it seem like it is a product of unnatural selection, but since humans are part of nature and act in and on nature, perhaps it was natural selection after all). I think the essay is readable, and to the discerning mind, it presents in a non-dry way some real facts about DNA and evolution that can be generalized to all life.
You may also find other of my essays in various MENSA publications as well as in various so-called Super Mensa publications and in various other places.
And, you may also want to buy my books. You'll find links to them after many of my essays.
# # #
Here's the essay that I mentioned above...
|Perhaps we have a lesson to learn from the Hass avocado, Grasshopper; and about the mutant-hating bastards who are trying to kill us all off.|
In the 1920's, Rudolph Hass planted some seedling avocado trees that he thought were all of the Lyon variety. One of the trees turned out to be different. It produced smaller, darker, bumpier avocados.
The Hass children ate some of these different avocados and told their father that they preferred the new avocados over the old ones. Rudloph investigated and learned that not only was this the only tree of its type in his orchard but there were no others like it anywhere.
Apparently, it was a mutation of some other type of avocado tree--perhaps a Lyon, perhaps not. Anyway, this sole tree was, as far as anyone knows, the first Hass avocado tree. It was a break with other avocado trees. A new beginning. A veritable Adam and Eve of the avocado world. It was the mother of all Hass avocado trees in the world today. Hass patented the variety in 1935 and worked out a deal with a nearby nursery to grow and sell the trees.
Today, there are approximately 80 million Hass trees around the world. All are descended from this one tree, which is still standing in La Habra, California. The Hass avocado has now become the industry standard. In other words, the genes of this one mutant now dominate the world of avocados.
"You're an avocado supremacist!" come the cries from the pinhead multiracialists. "Don't you know that there are three species of avocados and more than 100 varieties (the equivalent of races) of the things? We demand that you stop saying that Hass avocados are better. All avocados grow on trees. All avocados are the same under the skin. All avocados are equal. God loves all avocados just the same. We demand avocado diversity and we demand that all varieties of avocado be sold and consumed in equal quantities and that we have affirmative action for those varieties that aren't accepted because of their skin color. It's not their fault. It's the environment. If you prefer one avocado over another, then you're a varietiest. If there wasn't Hass avocado discrimination then these other avocados would be treated the same. It's time that avocado supremacists stopped their evil ways. We demand integrated avocado orchards to stop the bigotry and hate. There is a marvelous tapestry of avocados. Celebrate avocado diversity. If you aren't treating all avocados just the same, then you're a Nazi. Also, the word avocado comes from the Nahuatl (Aztec) word "ahuacatl" which translates as testicle, so not only are you an avocado supremacist and separatist, you're also a sexist."
Ho hum, yawn. We've heard these silly cliches over and over again, haven't we?
But, the easily intimidated among us say: "But, but, but, I'm not a varietiest. I love all avocados just the same. Why, I don't even notice the difference between avocados (This is a big lie, of course. Hass avocados are popular largely because they taste better, don't have fibers inside as do some varieties, don't get watery as do some varieties, and have a higher oil content which makes them richer and better for guacamole than other avocados). I don't even notice that some avocados are green and some are black when they're ripe."
Consider, just to get the intellectual juices flowing, the biblical story of Adam and Eve. Might we not speculate that the story, at its core, isn't really a myth at all and that, as with so many myths, there are elements of truth in the tale? Could it be that the creation of Adam and Eve was not the creation of all humans, as many Bible classes teach, but was just a new departure for humans? Two Hass avocado trees of the human kind, so to speak. What if the reality was that Adam and Eve were really the first white people on this brown planet? What if original sin was miscegenation? What if Christians have been trying for centuries to remove original sin but that they don't even know that their rituals are meaningless because the only way to remove original sin is to physically purify the blood (meaning the genotype)? What if being thrown out of the Garden of Eden really was about Adam and Eve having to live as the older forms of humans because of their miscegenation and that their children and their children's children have carried this original sin of miscegenation in their genes ever since? What if the way to rid oneself of this original sin is to "inbreed" for many generations in a sort of distilling process to remove the fruits of the forbidden tree--miscegenation--from the genes? These things are taught in at least one religion I know of. Some may dismiss this as nonsense, but those who do so are showing religious bigotry and a lack of tolerance for the beliefs of others. As a religious teaching, what has just been written above is as valid as any other religious teaching. Ultimately, one either believes, or one does not. That's what religion is all about.
We also have an inkling of other departures for humans. According to Bryan Sykes who wrote The Seven Daughters of Eve, all Europeans are descended from seven mothers. The earliest one lived about 45,000 years ago, probably in Greece. There were many other women alive at the time, but this one woman and six others, if Sykes is right, are the mothers of all Europeans and European peoples alive today. These six were the Hass avocado trees of Europeans, so to speak. They were a new departure. Their genes dominated all others. The others died off. Perhaps these others practiced miscegenation, and died off as their genes were swamped by the genes of others. Whatever happened, they and their genes disappeared. They were dead ends.
|So, the Hass avocado was a chance mutation. Adam and Eve may have been chance mutations. The seven daughters of Eve may also have been chance mutations. Nature bubbles up such chance mutations all the time. Most die off, some don't.|
Could it be that humans, in the time we find ourselves in, must now will our own mutations and evolution if we truly hope for a better world with less disease and longer happier lives? Could it be that nature gets creatures to the point where we are now and then leaves it up to them to struggle to move forward, or, like leaves in a stream, be pulled back down stream? Human evolution does seem stalled. Maybe this is just a dwell point between moving forward and being pulled back, and maybe we better start paddling with all our might so we can move up stream, or the natural pull of the stream will pull us back down to the dark ocean of ever lower consciousness. If this analogy is a valid one, then all that is needed for us to be pulled back downstream is that we do nothing. Going upstream, on the other hand, requires struggle. Could it be that we have a choice to make?--do nothing or struggle. Some believe this is the case.
It gets more complicated, though, because there are dark, evil forces in the world that don't want humans to evolve higher. They want humans to become less, not more. They don't want different human varieties to separate out and follow their own destinies. They want all humans to mate with all other humans to eliminate all differences. Most of these evil doers consciously or subconsciously hate white people and wish that white people were all extinct. These people, who are sometimes called multiracialists or even multiculturalists (I often prefer "blenders") or anti-racists, want to see whites mate with non-whites so that whites are destroyed. Most of these haters won't put it in those terms, but look beyond their slick smiles and their false compassionate sounding catch phrases to what will happen if these evil doers prevail over good.
Their ways will result in the complete annihilation of white people--genocide. These pinhead multiracialists and multiculturalists and so-called anti-racists simply don't like white people and they never will like white people. It's a genetic thing with some of them and its a matter of conditioning with others. Oh, you may find many of these people who seem to like white people, to their faces, but their hatred is often part of their genetic program. Whites are their natural enemies.
Will the haters of whites win, or will whites survive? History will tell the tale, but as thinking creatures, it's up to us to try to see that we do survive. It's just part of the big struggle that everything in our universe goes through. It's not even a very big part of the cosmic struggle except to us. Our "worth" has to be first measured by our own ideas of this worth. If we think that we are a people who should survive, then we'll struggle to make this happen. If, however, we are neurotic and feel that we should be destroyed, we'll also work in conscious and unconscious ways to see that happen. Either way, we need to understand that those who don't like white people will work in their own struggle to destroy us either outright or through bedroom genocide.
Although I've characterized this as good against evil, in a larger cosmic sense there is no good or evil in any of this. It is just the workings of nature. The good and evil are relative. Those who want to destroy us are evil in our eyes. Our wanting to survive is evil in their eyes. We need to understand the struggle for what it truly is and not be distracted with false ideas of the nature of reality. The reason we have to do this is because our tool of survival in the universe is our ability to think and reason. Nature doesn't care if we survive or become extinct. It is up to us to decide how to survive and to become more. We might change the old "I think, therefore I am," to "I think I should survive, therefore I should survive."
The next time you have some guacamole at a restaurant, you can be almost certain that it's Hass avocado guacamole. All avocados are not really the same, amigos. Neither are people. Genes matter. Let's hear it for the mutant avocado and for Rudolph Hass, who kept it separate and didn't let it blend back in with the other varieties of avocados. Had he not kept the Hass avocado separate, you'd be eating watery, less satisfying guacamole today.
|# # #|
THE BIGGER STUFF...
D.C. POLICE RELEASE VIDEO OF BLACK PUKES WHO ATTACKED DECORATED MARINE VET AS HE WAS LEAVING A MCDONALDS
Yes, it's what I call bedroom genocide and the Han Chinese will pay people to do it.
|ETHNIC GROUPS IN CHINA (The Han are by far the largest group and|
are 92% of the population of mainland China)
By the way, this bedroom genocide is what the Israelis are trying to avoid in Israel by trying to stop young Jews from marrying Arabs.
Hatred isn't needed for genocide to take place. Genocide simply means: Gen=genes/cide=death.
The reality is that hatred of another people often stops bedroom genocide and helps the distinct people survive because there is usually separation and a social stigma attached to mixing and mating. So there you have it: Hatred of a distinct people often means they survive. Love of a distinct people often means you kill them off.
Physical love is the modern way of genocide. Simply swamp the gene pool of a distinct but smaller population of people with your own genes and let nature run its course and the distinct smaller population will cease to exist in time. And, when you do this, you won't face war crime trials and you won't be accused of crimes against humanity even as you wipe out distinct peoples.
By the way, I've been writing about the genocide programs of the Han on this site since 2009. Here's one of my shorter articles on this from CM PRESS # 140 of May 21, 2010:
DALAI LAMA TWEETS TO CHINA
Link (Link may be old, but there is a search feature at the link)
Here's the real story, that is only hinted at in the above link: The Han Chinese are trying to wipe out the Tibetans.
They are taking various steps to do this, but the final solution involves bedroom genocide. The Han Chinese are simply flooding Tibet with Han Chinese and letting nature take over.
As the number of Han Chinese in Tibet rises, mating choices will often involve native Tibetans and Han Chinese. And, the Han Chinese outnumber the native Tibetans by many millions of individuals. The big fish eats the little one.
In time, Tibet will become Han Chinese and China will have taken over Tibet by absorption and without firing a shot. And, no one will ever bring those behind this genocide up on charges of genocide because there were no mass firing squads, no ovens, no gas chambers.
# # #
TAMPA COPS REFUSE TO WORK AT BEYONCE CONCERT
It's because of her anti-Cop song (it's also anti-White, but if the cops used that as their reason, they'd be called racist given our present anti-White cimate. Of course, if a singer did an anti-Black song, it would be okay for cops to say that's why they don't want to work the event. You see how this double standard stuff works, right? ).
# # #