[We've left the original misspellings in.]
Here's the way the correction paragraph appeared in the Pilot after Epperson's column:
[For the Record, 6:13 p.m., Oct. 16: An early version of this commentary incorrectly identified city Public Affairs Director Dan Joyce as a member of the OC Marathon Board. He is not on the board, nor is he affiliated with the marathon as an upaid volunteer. The piece also misstated that he was "hand-picked by the City Council majority" for his job. In fact, he was first hired by the city CEO's office, not the City Council, in 2011. In addition, the piece alleged the council majority approved a no-bid contract for the 60th Anniversary party. In fact, the City Council as a whole approved $125,000 of city money toward the entire event, not just the portion that went to KB Event Management. Also, an assertion that Baugh's company donated $8,000 to the marathon was incorrect. The marathon foundation was compensated $5,000 to apply for a liquor license for the event; the remaining $3,000 was donated from TasteFest to the marthon's children's program.]
Here's the above dense Daily Pilot correction paragraph after we pulled it apart and added numbers and notes in red for ease in reading and understanding it.
[For the Record, 6:13 p.m., Oct. 16:
Not a member of the board.
# 1: An early version of this commentary incorrectly identified city Public Affairs Director Dan Joyce as a member of the OC Marathon Board. He is not on the board,
Not an unpaid volunteer.
# 2: nor is he affiliated with the marathon as an upaid volunteer.
Not handpicked.
# 3: The piece also misstated that he was "hand-picked
Not by the City Council majority.
# 4: by the City Council majority" for his job.
Not hired by the City Council...but by the city CEO's office.
# 5: In fact, he was first hired by the city CEO's office, not the City Council, in 2011.}
Not by the council majority.
# 6: In addition, the piece alleged the council majority approved a no-bid contract for the 60th Anniversary party.
Not the council majority, but the City Council as a whole.
# 7: In fact, the City Council as a whole approved $125,000 of city money toward the entire event, not just the portion that went to KB Event Management.
Not correct that Baugh's company donated $8,000 to the marathon.
# 8: Also, an assertion that Baugh's company donated $8,000 to the marathon was incorrect.
Liquor license $ 5,000; $3,000 donated to children's program.
# 9: The marathon foundation was compensated $5,000 to apply for a liquor license for the event; the remaining $3,000 was donated from TasteFest to the marthon's children's program.]
# # #
BROOKLYN
'It keeps happening, and they keep wondering why'
More stupid Whites who can't figure out why Blacks attacked them. Hey, how about because they hate you because of the color of your skin? Are you so stupid that you can't figure that out yet? Are you so brainwashed that your mind just can't understand reality even when you see statistics on the horrendously high level of attacks on Whites? Cognitive dissonance got you in its grip? The world around you in America is not what the elites want you to believe it is.
# # #
THE TEA PARTY AND GOP: HEADING FOR DIVORCE
Column by Kevin MacDonald in the Occidental Observer.
# # #
MORE ON EPPERSON'S APOLOGY
There are additional comments under Epperson's apology, and it sounds like a couple of folks understand a little about the law in this regard.
One woman calls others names and essentially dares them to sue her. She apparently understands the difference between expressing an opinion and making a false assertion of fact. And there are some hints, maybe, that a person or two might understand the concepts of "public figures," and "malice."
We'll have to see how this all plays out, and the results of the investigation of the two employees put on leave by the City may tilt things one way or the other.
# # #
No comments:
Post a Comment