UPDATE: WE JUST RECEIVED THE ANSWERS TO A READER'S QUESTIONS
Push poll question: 12. City council spent thousands on new carpet and remodeling of city hall, do you agree with this type of spending?
Mr. Lobdell's answer: The proposed $7 million in upgrades for City Hall in the 2010-2011 budget was part of an unfunded, 7-year, $204-million capital improvement program, which included needed road repairs, fire station renovations and park improvements that have been on the city’s to-do list for years. The City Hall renovations have not been started—and there are not plans to do so in the foreseeable future—because the city doesn’t have the funds. Though needed, the City Hall repairs are not a priority right now.
Push poll question: 13. City bureaucrats keep changing the size of the budget deficit. It's changed from a large deficit to a small deficit and now no deficit in an effort to make the city more partisan. Do you think their actions are misleading?
Mr. Lobdell's answer: The council passed the 2010-2011 budget last June with a deficit of more than $11.2 million. Because of increased tax revenues, employee concessions and budget cuts, that deficit now stands at about $1.6 million (including the $200,000 added for consultant services), and that’s the budget gap the City is projected to finish the fiscal year with.
The budget gap for the 2011-2012 fiscal year initially came in at $5 million from the first numbers submitted by each department. In addition, council has indicated that it wants to adequately invest in infrastructure and technology and replenish its reserves, which would add more to in the initial budget gap.
City Chief Executive Officer Tom Hatch has said he’ll submit a balanced 2011-2012 budget to the City Council on May 17, along with a 5-year budget projection that will include estimates of revenues, expenditures and funding for infrastructure, technology and replenishment of its reserves.
It’s also important to note that Costa Mesa still has $222 million (the actual market number, according to CalPERS) in unfunded pension liabilities and $35.4 million in unfunded retirement health benefits.
Push poll question: 14. City politicians are laying off employees while they spent $90,000 printing newsletters available online. A $50,000 car allowance for 3 council members, and hundreds on gold name badges the same day they sent out layoff notices to city employees. Do you agree with their actions?
Mr. Lobdell's answer: It will take some time to research the alleged $90,000 in printing costs for newsletters, but, for example, the City does print a Recreation Guide that for its residents. Not everyone in the City—especially seniors—get their information online.
Council members do not get a car allowance.
I think the badges are a reference to what the employees association is calling “jewel-encrusted” nameplates. These are not “nameplates” but council badges that cost $175 a piece. For decades, the City has given badges to all council members as ceremonial gifts when they first take office. I suppose the badges can used to identify oneself as a council member but I imagine they are rarely, if ever, used that way.
Another error: The badges weren’t ordered on St. Patrick’s Day. They were ordered on Feb. 9, 2011 and shipped on March 17, 2011.
And finally, they aren’t “jewel-encrusted.” The badges have a single tiny fleck of what the vendor calls a “ruby” for the eagle’s eye.
In a city that faces $222 million (current market value, according to CalPERS) in unfunded pension liabilities, $35.4 million in unfunded retirement health benefit liabilities, recent depletion of its reserves by more than $30 million and is working to close a multi-million dollar budget gap for the 2011-2012 fiscal year, questioning the purchase for two council badges for $175 each is a diversion from the real budget challenges.
# # #
LOBDELL MORE OPAQUE THAN TRANSPARENT? [3:44 p.m. 5/6/11--See Update above for answers we just received from Mr. Lobdell.]
In the old days (just a few months ago), if the CM PRESS had a question regarding the municipal government, we would often email City Manager Allan Roeder and we'd always get a quick answer.
Now that the City has hired Bill Lobdell as the City's communications director we can't seem to get quick answers. This is not the first example of this, either.
Below is an email that we sent to Bill Lobdell at 8:35 a.m. this morning.
It's now 1:55 p.m. and we haven't even received an acknowledgment of our email.
5/6/11--8:35 AM
Hi Mr. Lobdell,
The following three questions are reportedly part of a telephone push poll that is being conducted in Costa Mesa.
A reader of my blog, the CM PRESS, wants to know if there's any truth to the assertions in these questions and, if not, exactly what might the pollster be using to make such assertions.
Do you have any short answers that I can publish?
Respectfully,
M. H. Millard
----------------------------------
12. City council spent thousands on new carpet and remodeling of city hall, do you agree with this type of spending?
13. City bureaucrats keep changing the size of the budget deficit. It's changed from a large deficit to a small deficit and now no deficit in an effort to make the city more partisan. Do you think their actions are misleading?
14. City politicians are laying off employees while they spent $90,000 printing newsletters available online. A $50,000 car allowance for 3 council members, and hundreds on gold name badges the same day they sent out layoff notices to city employee. Do you agree with their actions?
# # #
THE HARM THAT MISPLACED COMPASSION IS DOING TO ALL CITIZENS OF COSTA MESA
Suppose Wendy Leece or Crissy Brooks or any of the other charity mavens just came over and cut one of your bedrooms out of your home?
Imagine that they could just rip it out and patch up the hole. Then imagine that they used the wood from that bedroom to, oh, build a fire to keep illegal aliens warm and comfortable in Costa Mesa.
What would the result be for you?
Well, you just lost thousands of dollars in value to your home because now it's smaller and has one less bedroom.
That, in essence, is what is going on in Costa Mesa.
By keeping parts of our city downscale, it's almost as though these two and other charity mavens have ripped out part of our homes and made them less valuable.
Compassion that helps those who shouldn't even be in the city, at our expense, is false compassion and it is not praiseworthy.
# # #
CRISSY BROOKS HELPS ANOTHER FAMILY WITH AT LEAST ONE ILLEGAL ALIEN MEMBER STAY HAPPY AND COMFORTABLE ON THE WESTSIDE INSTEAD OF MOVING TO WHERE THEY CAN AFFORD TO LIVE
Link
Misplaced compassion is helping keep part of the Westside a skid row.
And, when our City Council gives our money to charities that are magnets for people who can't afford to live in Costa Mesa without subsidies the problems grow.
Wendy Leece also promotes the magnet charities.
Wendy's usual excuse for helping keep the Westside down is that she's helping "the kids."
"The kids" is always a big excuse for lefties like
Leece.
Hey,
Wendy and
Crissy, how about the citizens of Costa Mesa and the Westside? Don't they deserve a better and safer city with high performing schools? Why are you snubbing them? Why are you helping illegal aliens?
If you want to help poor people, why don't you two go to a poor country instead of importing the poor country here for your limousine compassion?
# # #
PUSH POLL SCRIPT BEING USED BY BIG UNION
(According to a reader. This also appears in comments section of CM PRESS # 489.)
J said...
I got a call from California Opinion Research (916) 443-4722 at 6:00pm this evening. They say they are contracted by “Costa Mesa City Wide” to conduct a survey of people in the area.
Asked to answer with not likely, most likely, or definitely:
1. How likely are you to vote in the 2011 special election?
Asked to answer the following with positive, negative or neutral:
2. Have you heard of mayor Monahan?
3. Have you heard of Steven Mensinger?
4. Have you heard of Mayor pro tem Righeimer?
5. Have you heard of Wendy Leece?
6. Have you heard of Costa Mesa Public Employees Association?
7. Costa Mesa City Council?
8. OC Employee Association?
9. City council proposal to outsource city employees and services?
10. The city council has proposed to outsource 213 jobs or nearly half the city staff what do you think of this proposal?
Asked to give an answer to:
11. Where did you hear about this proposal?
Asked to answer the following with disagree neutral or agree:
12. City council spent thousands on new carpet and remodeling of city hall, do you agree with this type of spending?
13. City bureaucrats keep changing the size of the budget deficit. It's changed from a large deficit to a small deficit and now no deficit in an effort to make the city more partisan. Do you think their actions are misleading?
14. City politicians are laying off employees while they spent $90,000 printing newsletters available online. A $50,000 car allowance for 3 council members, and hundreds on gold name badges the same day they sent out layoff notices to city employee. Do you agree with their actions?
15. Instead of outsourcing these city jobs should the city consider reducing council members pay and perks including a 10,000 car allowance for the city manager?
16. Some people claim city employee wages and Pension costs are bankrupting the city should the city council be considering outsourcing city jobs and services to balance the budget?
17. Do you support a recall of Mayor Monohan
18. Recall Eric Bever?
19. Recall Mayor pro tem Righiemer?
20. Recall Steve Mensinger?
21. City workers say the top 4 council members efforts have polarized the city are they out of line or doing the right thing?
Asked to give an answer:
22. Do you own Cable or Satellite TV?
23. Do you consider yourself a liberal moderate or conservative?
24. Last year of education completed?
25. Do you or any member of your household belong to a labor union?
26. Do you have a facebook account?
27. Whats your race?
28. What year were you born?
This is the order questions were given and I did my best to use the exact wording used. I got the impression the survey was intended to be negative towards members of the city council and the proposal to outsource employees to balance the city budget.
Another reader comments on the above:
May 5, 2011 7:03:00 PM PDT
Anonymous said...
Interesting comments about the opinion survey! I believe this same polling company has been calling my home to speak to my wife - a Dem and in a union. They are calling several times a day for the last week and so far missed her because of her busy schedule. Their persistance suggests she is selected specifically because she fits some model of who is likely to provide answers they are seeking. It appears the survey is designed to produce a desired result calling into question their selection criteria.
# # #