Read the above article and then come back here and we'll tell you what we think is really going on.
Okay, you're back. What we think is happening in America right now is that the pendulum has begun to swing back.
Whites, in increasing numbers, aren't saying but, but, but...when some anti-White crackpot tries to silence them whenever the White says anything that makes sense about race. We think the GOP candidates sense this swing and they're gently trying to use this emerging new reality to their advantage.
Whites have been beaten down psychologically for several decades now and the smart money new that wasn't going to last forever.
The anti-White bigots will still thrash around and call Whites racists for even daring to tell the truth about the horrendously high violent Black crime rate or other hard facts, but "racist" is not going to have the sting it used to have.
# # #
UPDATE: ANTI-WHITE LATINO GANG MEMBERS BEING JAILED IN SAN CLEMENTE
Establishment has tried to cover up the anti-White nature of recent attacks. Even in the above news article you can see how they once again don't discuss race/ethnicity but when you dig deeper (as we have) you get to the truth.
Folks, if Whites attack people of another race/ethnicity, the establishment makes a big deal about it, but when non-Whites attack Whites (which is far more frequent) the establishment tries to cover up the race/ethnicity angle.
Why should you be aware of the race/ethnicity of the attackers and victims? It helps you stay informed so you can play the odds and reduce your risk of being a victim.
If it's blond Swedes attacking people, you should also be informed of that; but that's not the case, is it?
# # #
 |
| Colin McCarthy |
COSTA MESA TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION STRIKES a BLOW FOR A FREE COSTA MESA TOMORROW
The know-nothings and assorted cranks have been doing their mouth breathing at recent City Council meetings as they spew their hate at the good Councilmembers, but tomorrow night the Costa Mesa Taxpayers Association enters the fray to help set the record straight.
Here's the info (slightly edited by CM PRESS) from Colin McCarthy who heads the group:
CMTax meeting on Thursday January 19th at 6:00 p.m. at the Neighborhood Community Center (adjacent to Lion’s Park). The meeting is free and open to the public.
In addition to hearing from our Assemblyman, Hon. Allan Mansoor, about the Stop Special Interest Money Campaign which will appear on the November ballot, we are hosting a critical panel discussion of Costa Mesa’s Charter City proposal. Our panelists include Costa Mesa Mayor Pro Tem Jim Righeimer, key proponent of the Charter proposal, Costa Mesa Councilmember Steve Mensinger, who will explain his position, and Oceanside City Councilmember Jerry Kern.
So why did we invite a Councilmember from the City of Oceanside to a Costa Mesa meeting? Oceanside voters recently approved a Charter proposal for their City. Measure “K” passed in June 2010 by a 54% to 46% margin despite significant and expensive opposition by organized labor. Mr. Kern was part of the battle to return Oceanside back to its residents by approving their Charter. Oceanside’s Charter is very similar to the Charter being proposed in Costa Mesa.
At first glance, the process can appear to be expedited. However, upon closer review that is not the case. The Charter idea was brought forward in early December. There have already been several public hearings on the Charter with several more to come. If it is approved to go before voters, that approval will not come until March, with an additional three months of education and outreach after that. All told, Costa Mesa voters will have six months from beginning to end to vet and consider the Charter before voting on it.
If the Charter was postponed until the November election it would have to compete with a litany of proposed Statewide ballot measures, including several anticipated measures to raise taxes. Add in a Presidential, U.S. Senate and Congressional race, State and local races, and it’s easy to see how the Charter would get lost in the mix. With a June election, the Charter will be the only measure on the ballot and will get its own top-billing and due consideration by the voters. In fact, most other cities that have enacted Charters (including Oceanside) have voted on the Charter in the June primary election.
Sadly, opponents of the Charter are utilizing this schedule to defeat it. They are not attacking the merits of Costa Mesa becoming a Charter City, but instead are saying that this schedule is essentially a power-grab by our fiscally conservative City Council. In fact, just this past weekend [some people] were out leafleting neighborhoods trying to drum-up opposition to the Charter even before it has been finalized or placed on the ballot! The Unions stand to lose if Costa Mesa divorces itself from Sacramento politicians and they will stop at nothing to prevent us from taking back our City.
I have not totally made up my mind on the proposed Charter, however, and I look forward to hearing more about the proposal from Mayor Pro Tem Righeimer and the City during our robust discussion about the merits of the Charter at our meeting on January 19th (invitation attached). I hope to see you there.
Please tell your friends and neighbors to add their names to our email list at www.CMTax.org/JoinUs.php and forward our updates to anyone you think may enjoy reading them. You can also visit our Facebook page, www.Facebook.com/CMTax!
Colin McCarthy
President, Costa Mesa Taxpayers Association
Colin@CMTax.org
# # #
JEWISH GUY CALLS ROMNEY THE WHITEST CANDIDATE---HORRORS!
This guy even has a problem with Romney's clean white shirts.
# # #
POWER GRAB? CUT AND PASTE? THE CITIZENS MUST NOT LOSE CONTROL OF OUR CITY? THE BUTCHER, THE BAKER AND THE CANDLESTICK MAKER--HUH?
 |
| Tamar Goldmann |
The draft charter is only seven pages long and should be easily understood by your average sixth grader. It is not a power grab and mostly keeps the same type of government that we have now, but just takes some power away from Sacramento and gives it to the citizens of Costa Mesa.
VERBOSE VERSION:
Just prior to the start of last night's City Council meeting, Tamar Goldmann, a frequent critic of the good Councilmembers, threaded her way through the rows of seats handing out a yellow flyer to anyone who would accept it. Goldmann got near us but avoided giving us a flyer. However, some kids who did get the flyer and who didn't want it gave us one.
The yellow flyer seems to be Ms. Goldmann's attempt to justify and explain a green flyer handed out prior to the January 10th City Council meeting that Councilmember Mensinger took to task in such a way that Ms. Goldmann apparently took his comments as a personal attack on her.
In the yellow flyer (the one handed out last night), Ms. Goldmann says she didn't write the green flyer but did help distribute it and that she does agree with what it says. But, ah, she did write the yellow flyer and is also distributing it.
With us so far? Yeah, we know, yellow, green, this meeting, that meeting, didn't write that one but did distribute it, did write this one and is distributing it. Yawn.
Anyway, we wanted to give you a little of the flavor of things these days.
Now, to the substance.
The Green Flyer (January 10th City Council meeting)
The green flyer says it was prepared by Costa Mesans for Responsible Government and its headline is STOP THE POWER GRAB! It urges residents to attend the January 10th City Council meeting. This is apparently the leaflet that was dropped on doorsteps, and which was mentioned by the Robin Lefflers in the Daily Pilot, that we wrote about before.
Here's how it starts off: "Four guys on the City Council, a pub owner, a developer, a real estate 'consultant', and an antique dealer, decided to junk the system of general laws governing our city and make up their own rules in a HASTILY prepared city charter."
Oh no! Not a pub owner, a developer, a real estate 'consultant,' and an antique dealer! We're doomed. Head for the hills.
But wait a minute. Folks, all the City Council members have regular jobs. They always have. That's the idea: have regular citizens as Councilmembers. It's called democracy. It's called elect the people who are your neighbors to the Council because they're living under the same conditions as you and thus may be more responsive to the needs of the ordinary citizens of the city.
But, look, you're supposed to believe that a pub owner, a developer, a real estate 'consulant,' and an antique dealer don't have the brainpower to write a draft charter. Isn't that the real intent of telling you their jobs?
However, didn't the flyer say the pub owner, et al. had cut and pasted the draft charter?
So, the butcher, the baker and the candlestick maker, er, you know what we mean, were bright enough to look at other charters and take the things from those charters prepared by citizen committees and polished by presumably high paid lawyers, and put them in Costa Mesa's draft charter which was also polished by Costa Mesa's City Attorney. That's the right way to do things. Why start from scratch? Why try to reinvent the wheel?
For our part, we're all for the charter and we're all for having the Council do its job and take the initiative on such things as they are now doing by coming up with a time saving and efficient way of presenting a draft charter to the citizens of Costa Mesa.
We could go on, and maybe we will later, but we'll leave it at this for now.
# # #
Those are our opinions. Thanks for reading them.
0 comments:
Post a Comment